Moh. Muhibbin
Magister Hukum, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Islam Malang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Protection of the Right to Marry Against Guardians' Refusal Based on Javanese Custom Taboos Nur Azizah; Ahmad Syaifudin; Moh. Muhibbin
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2297

Abstract

General Background: The right to marry is protected within Indonesian law, while Islamic marriage requires a guardian whose authority is not absolute when refusal lacks a legitimate religious basis. Specific Background: At the Blitar Religious Court, wali nasab refusal may arise from Javanese customary taboos involving weton or jilu, ngalor-ngulon, kebo balik kandang, the Brantas River boundary, and beliefs associated with parental death. Knowledge Gap: Prior studies have examined wali adhal, guardian authority, and customary marriage law, but empirical analysis combining customary refusal, protection of the prospective bride’s right to marry, and judicial reasoning remains limited. Aims: This empirical juridical study examines forms of refusal, legal protection through wali adhal and wali hakim, and judges’ ratio decidendi using statutory, case, sociological, interview, documentation, and literature approaches. Results: Refusals are mainly rooted in personal and psychological fears inherited through customary beliefs rather than recognized legal impediments. Wali adhal determination and wali hakim appointment provide a formal remedy, while judges assess whether stated reasons are valid under Islamic and Indonesian positive law; restrictive customs without such basis may fall within 'urf fasid. Novelty: The study connects Javanese customary beliefs, Islamic marriage law, the constitutional right to marry, and judicial reasoning in actual Blitar cases. Implications: Judicial review of customary grounds can preserve cultural consideration while securing legal certainty and access to lawful marriage Highlights: Weton or jilu, ngalor-ngulon, kebo balik kandang, Brantas River boundaries, and parental-death beliefs were identified as reasons for rejection. A court-appointed substitute may enable the union to proceed when family consent is withheld without a valid religious or statutory basis. Judges test asserted traditions against Islamic and positive law; unsupported restrictions may be classified as 'urf fasid. Keywords: Right to Marry, Wali Adhal, Wali Nasab, Javanese Customary Prohibitions, Legal Protection 
Juridical Implications of Reforming Child Guardianship Requirements on Children's Rights Protection Under Minister of Social Affairs Regulation Number 7 of 2024 Dianita Nuryani Putri; Moh. Muhibbin; Diyan Isnaeni
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 27 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2298

Abstract

General Background: Child guardianship is a legal mechanism for protecting children who are no longer under effective parental authority, and appointment decisions should prioritize the best interests of the child. Specific Background: Minister of Social Affairs Regulation Number 7 of 2024 introduces more detailed mechanisms for assessing prospective guardians, including social assessment, home visits, Social Work Reports, and supporting suitability requirements. Knowledge Gap: Its implementation raises unresolved questions about the legal position of these assessments in judicial proceedings, their procedural status, and their relationship with judicial independence. Aims: This normative legal study, supported by a limited socio-legal perspective, examines the regulation’s implementation and legal position in relation to legal certainty, prospective-guardian assessment, and children’s rights. Results: The framework moves guardianship from predominantly administrative screening toward substantive, child-centered assessment, provides a broader factual basis for identifying risks before appointment, and supplies more detailed technical standards. Consistent application, however, depends on institutional capacity, professional assessment availability, inter-agency coordination, and judicial interpretation. Novelty: The study links the revised assessment framework with preventive legal protection, legal certainty, and the best interests of the child while preserving the court’s evidentiary authority. Implications: Continued coordination and clear procedural guidance are needed so that implementation remains consistent without limiting judicial independence or displacing the child’s welfare as the central consideration. Highlights: Social workers, home visits, and Social Reports broaden the factual basis for evaluating prospective caretakers. Early screening can identify risks of neglect, violence, exploitation, and property mismanagement before appointment. Uniform application depends on institutional capacity, inter-agency coordination, professional resources, and consistent judicial interpretation. Keywords: Child Guardianship, Children’s Rights Protection, Legal Certainty, Best Interests of the Child, Minister of Social Affairs Regulation Number 7 of 2024.