Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Language and Communication Studies Indonesian Journal of Language and Economic Discourse Indonesian Journal of Computational Language Studies Indonesian Journal of Politics and Literary Studies Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics
Hasanudin
Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Performing the nation online: Multimodal government communication and the visual politics of Indonesian identity Hasanudin
Indonesian Journal of Language and Communication Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Digital citizenship, identity, and public discourse in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijlc.v1i3.1013

Abstract

Background: Indonesia's official digital communication increasingly performs national identity through multimodal arrangements of image, caption, logo, color, place, institutional voice, and platform format rather than through verbal policy messages alone. Objective: This research examines how Indonesian government and state-linked online channels construct, standardize, and circulate national identity across official visual-symbolic, cultural, territorial, and digital-governance materials. Method: Using a qualitative multimodal critical discourse design, this research analyzes 23 publicly accessible official digital items through a multimodal identity grid, a visibility hierarchy matrix, and a platformed government performance protocol. Results: Heritage, tourism, and cultural diversity formed the dominant assemblage, indicating that national belonging is most often made recognizable through curated places, landscapes, cultural motifs, museums, and regional heritage. Official visual systems and territorial-developmental narratives translated nationhood into standardized symbols, downloadable guidelines, Independence Day themes, and spatial imaginaries of Jakarta, Nusantara, and national progress. Digital citizenship appeared through literacy, safety, and child-protection frames, while participation remained institutionally bounded through polling, reuse, and campaign interaction. Implication: These findings show that online nation-making functions as controlled visibility, where diversity is displayed, standardized, and circulated through official platform infrastructures. Novelty: This research contributes an integrated framework for analyzing multimodal government communication as platformed national performance online.
From hustle to survival: entrepreneurial speech, class aspiration, and informal labor in Indonesian digital marketplaces Hasanudin
Indonesian Journal of Language and Economic Discourse Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Debt, inequality, and everyday economic life in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijle.v1i3.1023

Abstract

Background: Indonesian digital marketplaces have become crucial arenas where informal selling, platform visibility, and class aspiration are linguistically organized through entrepreneurial vocabularies of access, flexibility, and success. Objective: This study examines how public marketplace-related discourse reframes survival-oriented informal labor as entrepreneurial hustle, self-improvement, and upward mobility. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted critical discourse design, this study analyzes 49 public text units from Indonesian marketplace, government, and business-information sources through lexical-framing analysis, risk-obscuration mapping, and platform visibility governance mapping. Results: Findings show that entrepreneurial opportunity discourse dominates the corpus, positioning marketplace participation as access to buyers, expansion, and scalable business possibility. Risk is rarely foregrounded as insecurity; instead, it is reorganized through language of low capital, manageable fees, seller learning, promotion, and flexibility. Platform visibility emerges as a governing mechanism that encourages sellers to become data-responsive, promotional, and continuously adaptable economic subjects. Implication: This study demonstrates that marketplace discourse matters because it makes informal labor socially intelligible as ambition while softening dependence on platform infrastructures. Novelty: This study contributes a discourse-based perspective to Indonesian platform labor research by showing how hustle, survival, and aspiration converge within marketplace language.
Political talk at scale: argument mining, stance detection, and polarization in Indonesian electoral conversations Hasanudin
Indonesian Journal of Computational Language Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Computational sociolinguistics, speech, and digital discourse in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijcl.v1i3.1031

Abstract

Background: Indonesian electoral conversations increasingly unfold through large-scale digital interaction, where political judgment is shaped not only by sentiment but also by argumentative claims, target-specific stances, institutional distrust, and polarizing boundary-making. Objective: This study examines how argument mining, stance detection, and polarization analysis can explain the organization of Indonesian electoral discourse during the 2024 presidential election cycle. Method: This study applies a corpus-assisted computational discourse design to 240 coded public electoral conversation segments drawn from official debate materials, transcript sources, institutional documents, and platform-based political commentary. Results: Findings show that policy-based reasoning, candidate evaluation, institutional legitimacy, identity boundary-making, and platform-information concerns structure electoral arguments in distinct ways. Target-aware stance analysis reveals that support, opposition, and ambivalence acquire political meaning only when attached to candidates, institutions, policy issues, opponents, or digital actors. Polarization appears as a layered discursive configuration involving issue conflict, affective hostility, identity boundaries, institutional distrust, and platform-mediated antagonism. Implication: This study demonstrates that Indonesian electoral polarization cannot be adequately inferred from sentiment polarity alone. Novelty: This study contributes an integrated framework that connects argument structure, stance target, and polarization markers for analyzing Indonesian political talk at scale.
Writing after fear: post-authoritarian memory, censorship, and the literary reconstruction of political violence in Indonesia Hasanudin
Indonesian Journal of Politics and Literary Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Memory, violence, and post-authoritarian literary politics in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijpl.v1i3.1038

Abstract

Background: Indonesian post-authoritarian literature has become a crucial site for narrating political violence because official memory, archival access, and public recognition remain unevenly shaped by silence, stigma, and fear. Objective: This study examines how selected Indonesian literary and contextual texts reconstruct political violence through memory, censorship, and counter-archival narration after authoritarian rule. Method: Using qualitative interpretive textual analysis, this study analyzes a publicly verifiable corpus of literary works, scholarly studies, and contextual documents through memory-form mapping, censorship-and-fear reading, and counter-archive analysis. Results: First, damaged memory is most visible through fragmented temporality, spectral return, archival silence, and intergenerational transmission. Second, censorship appears not only as institutional prohibition but also as narrative hesitation, coded speech, withheld naming, allegorical displacement, and inherited suspicion. Third, literary reconstruction works counter-archivally by centering victims, families, exiles, stigmatized descendants, peripheral spaces, and poetic testimony without claiming documentary closure. Implication: This study shows that post-authoritarian literature should be read not merely as representation of past violence, but as a critical method for negotiating damaged public truth. Novelty: This study offers an integrated framework that links memory, censorship, fear, and counter-archive as interdependent mechanisms of writing after political violence.
From diagnosis to doubt: epistemic authority, patient questions, and the pragmatics of medical explanation in Indonesia Hasanudin
Indonesian Journal of Medical Linguistics Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Health literacy, consent, and institutional trust in Indonesian healthcare
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijml.v1i3.1047

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic explanation in Indonesian healthcare discourse is shaped by asymmetrical expertise, patient uncertainty, institutional authority, and increasing reliance on public digital health information. Objective: This study examines how epistemic authority is constructed, questioned, and recalibrated through patient questions and medical explanations in Indonesian diagnostic discourse. Method: Using a qualitative corpus-assisted pragmatic design, this study analyzed 35 public Indonesian explanation sequences drawn from patient Q&A texts, verified health education materials, and contextual documents on patient rights, second opinion, medical records, and diagnostic accountability. Results: Diagnostic authority was most visibly organized through expert interpretation, procedural validation, institutional diagnostic pathways, test-mediated evidence, professional redirection, and rights-based accountability. Patient questions functioned not merely as requests for information but as pragmatic acts of clarification, confirmation, risk inquiry, procedural checking, second-opinion comparison, and reassurance seeking. Medical explanations managed uncertainty through terminological simplification, evidential grounding, referral, risk calibration, uncertainty acknowledgement, and legally or institutionally framed accountability. Implication: This study shows that diagnostic trust depends on whether clinical authority remains intelligible, answerable, and reviewable when patients voice doubt. Novelty: This study contributes a pragmatic model for analyzing diagnostic doubt as a structured form of epistemic participation rather than a failure of patient compliance.
Co-Authors