Nabila Putri Sri Rahayu
Prodi D-III Gizi Politeknik Kesehatan Putra Indonesia Malang

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Mutu Fisik, Kandungan Gizi, dan Daya Terima Sensori Cookies dengan Substitusi Tepung Biji Kurma dan Tepung Daun Kelor Fitri Eka Lestari; Gita Ardelia Suhartono; Dwi Handayani; Naia Zhimran Isaxena; Christianus Vieri; Nabila Putri Sri Rahayu
PHARMADEMICA : Jurnal Kefarmasian dan Gizi Vol 6 No 1 (2026): April - September
Publisher : LPPM-KI - POLTEKKES PIM (Formerly AKAFARMA-AKFAR PIM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54445/pharmademica.v6i1.138

Abstract

Stunting is closely linked to the condition of the gut microbiota. This condition can be improved by consuming ingredients containing prebiotics, antioxidants, fatty acids, and protein found in date seeds and moringa leaves, which are then substituted into cookie products. The objective of this study was to develop a cookie formula using Date Seed Powder (DSP) and Moringa Leaf Powder  (MLP) as substitutes, and to analyze the product’s physical quality, nutritional content, and sensory acceptability. Three formulas were tested using DSP:MLP ratios of 50 g:30 g (F1), 55 g:25 g (F2), and 70 g:10 g (F3). Physical quality was analyzed using a texture profile analyzer (TPA), nutritional content was analyzed via proximate analysis, dietary fiber was measured using a triplicate multi-enzyme method, and a semi-trained panel of 25 participants conducted sensory evaluation. The results showed that the substitution of DSP and MLP significantly affected texture parameters, where F2 had the highest values for gumminess, chewiness, and cohesiveness (p<0.05), and there were no significant differences in hardness and fracture (p>0.05). Nutritional analysis showed that F1 had the highest protein content (7.08%) and total dietary fiber (8.47%), which differed significantly from the other formulas (p<0.05). Sensory acceptability testing indicated that all formulas were acceptable to the panelists, with F3 having the best acceptance level based on taste and aroma parameters. However, there were no significant differences in the parameters. F2 was selected as the superior formulation based on an integrated consideration of texture characteristics, nutritional composition, dietary fiber content, and sensory acceptability. Its nutritional and dietary fiber characteristics suggest potential for further development as a functional food to support dietary adequacy and gastrointestinal health in children with nutritional problems.