Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice
LiLy Herlina
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Social Ecological Model Analysis of Individual, Family, Peer, and Digital Environment Factors Associated with Cyberbullying Behavior among Adolescents Nurhayati Nurhayati; Anita Apriliawati; LiLy Herlina; Rohana Rohana; Danny Des Kartyko Lakoro
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): September
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v4i2.967

Abstract

Background: Globally, the incidence of cyberbullying remains considerably high. In Indonesia, approximately 45% of adolescents have experienced cyberbullying. The impact of cyberbullying can trigger mental health problems among adolescents who have experienced it. Objective: To develop a comprehensive understanding of cyberbullying behavior among adolescents through a social ecological model analysis integrating individual, family, peer, and digital environment factors. Methods: This study employed a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was conducted using the proportional random sampling technique, with a sample size of 284 respondents calculated using the Slovin formula. Data collection was carried out from February to March 2026. Results: The findings showed a significant association between individual, family, peer, and digital environment factors and cyberbullying behavior (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, peer and digital environment factors remained significantly associated with cyberbullying behavior. The peer factor had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.644 (95% CI: 1.583–4.415; p < 0.000), while the digital environment factor had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.102 (95% CI: 1.881–5.117; p < 0.000). Based on the adjusted odds ratio values, the digital environment factor showed the strongest association with cyberbullying behavior in the final model. Conclusions: The social ecological approach is highly relevant for explaining cyberbullying as a multidimensional phenomenon. These findings are expected to serve as a basis for developing effective and contextual interventions.
Social Ecological Model Analysis of Individual, Family, Peer, and Digital Environment Factors Associated with Cyberbullying Behavior among Adolescents Nurhayati Nurhayati; Anita Apriliawati; LiLy Herlina; Rohana Rohana; Danny Des Kartyko Lakoro
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): September
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v4i2.967

Abstract

Background: Globally, the incidence of cyberbullying remains considerably high. In Indonesia, approximately 45% of adolescents have experienced cyberbullying. The impact of cyberbullying can trigger mental health problems among adolescents who have experienced it. Objective: To develop a comprehensive understanding of cyberbullying behavior among adolescents through a social ecological model analysis integrating individual, family, peer, and digital environment factors. Methods: This study employed a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach. Sampling was conducted using the proportional random sampling technique, with a sample size of 284 respondents calculated using the Slovin formula. Data collection was carried out from February to March 2026. Results: The findings showed a significant association between individual, family, peer, and digital environment factors and cyberbullying behavior (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, peer and digital environment factors remained significantly associated with cyberbullying behavior. The peer factor had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.644 (95% CI: 1.583–4.415; p < 0.000), while the digital environment factor had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.102 (95% CI: 1.881–5.117; p < 0.000). Based on the adjusted odds ratio values, the digital environment factor showed the strongest association with cyberbullying behavior in the final model. Conclusions: The social ecological approach is highly relevant for explaining cyberbullying as a multidimensional phenomenon. These findings are expected to serve as a basis for developing effective and contextual interventions.
Co-Authors Anita Apriliawati Danny Des Kartyko Lakoro Nurhayati Nurhayati Rohana Rohana