Aldy Ridho Pangestu
Urology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada/Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Emerging Role of Padeliporfin Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy In Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Systematic Review Ahmad Zulfan Hendri; Aldy Ridho Pangestu
Contagion: Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal Health Vol 8, No 3 (2026): Contagion
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/contagion.v8i3.29276

Abstract

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon malignancy, accounting for only 5–10% of urothelial tumors, and often presents with invasive disease. Consequently,  radical nephroureterectomy remains the standard treatment despite its substantial impact on renal function. Padeliporfin vascular‑targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) is a novel kidney‑sparing modality in which intravenously administered padeliporfin is activated by endoluminal near‑infrared laser, selectively occlude tumor microvasculature and inducing coagulative necrosis while preserving surrounding tissues. This review synthesizes  evidence from a Phase I study and the Phase III ENLIGHTED trial involving adults with low‑grade, non–muscle‑invasive UTUC suitable for kidney-sparing management, focusing on  complete response (CR), durability of response, renal preservation, and safety outcomes. A search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified seven reports arising from these two single‑arm study programs. In the Phase I trial, which predominantly included patients with  residual or recurrent UTUC following unsuccessful endoscopic treatment, the 30‑day CR rate was 50%,, increasing to 68% after retreatment of partial responders, with an overall response rate of 94%  and preservation of both  renal function and kidneys at 6 months. In the ENLIGHTED trial, which enrolled patients with one or two small, biopsy‑confirmed low‑grade lesions, padeliporfin VTP achieved a CR rate of 73%  at first assessment, overall response rates exceeding 86%, and local recurrence rates ranging from 3.2 to 10.8%. Among complete responders, 88% maintained CR for at least 12 months, and the median duration of response was not reached after more than 23.9 months of follow-up. Adverse events were predominantly transient  Grade 1–2 urinary or flank symptoms; Grade 3 events were infrequent and short-lived, and no phototoxicity or ureteral strictures were reported. Padeliporfin VTP appears to be a promising kidney‑sparing treatment for selected patients with low‑grade UTUC, although  confirmation in randomized controlled trials is needed.  Keywords: Padeliporfin, Photodynamic Therapy, Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Kidney-Sparing Surgery, Endoscopic Ablation
Precision Desensitization In The Imlifidase Era: A Systematic Review of Biomarkers, Risk Stratification Models, and Personalized Treatment Algorithms For Hla-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Aldy Ridho Pangestu; Tanaya Ghinorawa
Contagion: Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal Health Vol 8, No 3 (2026): Contagion
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/contagion.v8i3.29280

Abstract

Highly human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized kidney transplant candidates with positive crossmatch have limited access to transplantation, prolonged exposure to dialysis, and increased mortality. Imlifidase, an IgG‑cleaving enzyme, can rapidly convert positive crossmatch to a negative crossmatch; however the roles of immunological biomarkers, risk stratification, and personalized treatment protocols remain insufficiently defined. The study systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for clinical studies involving adult HLA‑incompatible kidney transplant candidates or recipients treated with imlifidase. Studies reporting donor‑specific antibodies (DSA) or calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) together with crossmatch conversion, antibody‑mediated rejection (AMR), patient and graft survival, and safety outcomes were included. Results were synthesized descriptively because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Four clinical studies of imlifidase‑treated HLA‑incompatible kidney transplant recipients and one narrative review on biomarker‑based risk models and personalized algorithms met the eligibility criteria, although the narrative review was used solely to provide  conceptual context . Across the clinical cohorts, sample sizes ranged from 19 to 41 recipients, all of whom were highly sensitized, with median or mean cPRA values ranging from 90–100%. Imlifidase converted a positive crossmatch to a negative crossmatch in 89.5–100% of recipients within 24 hours, with short‑ to mid‑term patient survival rates of 87.5–100% and graft survival rates of 84–100%. Early AMR occurred in 22–39% of recipients and was consistently associated with DSA rebound emerging within 3–15 days after imlifidase administration. Current evidence indicates that imlifidase  provides a viable desensitization strategy for highly sensitized, crossmatch‑positive patients who otherwise have limited transplantation options; however, this benefit is tempered by a substantial burden of early AMR associated with DSA rebound. Reliance on small, nonrandomized cohorts and heterogeneous immunosuppressive and monitoring protocols limits the certainty of the available evidence, underscoring the need for prospective multicentre studies to validate composite biomarker‑based risk models and personalized treatment algorithms in imlifidase‑enabled HLA‑incompatible kidney transplantation.Keywords: Imlifidase, Kidney Transplantation, HLA-Incompatible, Desensitization, Donor-Specific Antibodies.