Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

“Suppose They Don’t Know It?”: Satire, Working-Class Anxiety, and Systemic Failure in The Hole (1962) Mahmud; Qori Islami Aris; Ely Hayati Nasution; Aqshal Alifa Mahmud
LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/lingpoet.v7i3.27477

Abstract

John and Faith Hubley’s Academy Award-winning animated short The Hole (1962) is widely recognized as a satire of Cold War anxieties surrounding nuclear catastrophe. This article extends that interpretation by examining how the film transforms geopolitical uncertainty into an everyday working-class discussion about accidents, institutional security, and technological control. Employing a close reading informed by Cultural Studies, this research analyses the film’s improvised dialogue, visual satire, and spatial representation of labor to investigate how ordinary people articulate their anxieties about systems upon which they depend but exercise little control. Particular attention is given to Gillespie’s recurring use of “suppose,” through which he challenges Mathews’s insistence that accidents can be anticipated, explained, or prevented. As their conversation progresses from domestic accidents to military technology and the possibility of nuclear catastrophe, the film exposes the limitations of institutional assurances and the persistent possibility of human error and unforeseen circumstances. Furthermore, the workers’ position beneath the city highlights the contradiction between their material contribution to modern civilization and their limited authority over the systems that sustain it. The article argues that The Hole satirizes the presumed infallibility of modern security systems while articulating working-class anxieties arising from systemic uncertainty. Beyond its immediate Cold War context, the film offers a continuing reflection on ordinary people’s vulnerability to institutional failures and their consequences.