Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja, Motivasi Kerja, dan Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Generasi Z pada Perusahaan Transportasi Laut Riki Kurniawan; Ika Yuliana; Baiq Nadia Nirwana
MANABIS: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Penelitian Pengabdian Algero

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54259/manabis.v5i3.8701

Abstract

Work productivity is an essential measure of organizational performance, especially in maritime transportation companies where operational efficiency, timeliness, safety, and service excellence are critical. Among Generation Z employees, productivity is influenced by various workplace factors, including the availability of adequate work facilities, strong work motivation, and effective leadership practices. Nevertheless, previous research has produced inconsistent results regarding the impact of these variables, highlighting the need for further investigation. This study investigates the effects of work facilities, work motivation, and leadership style on the work productivity of Generation Z employees at a maritime transportation company located in Batuleong Hamlet, West Sekotong District. A quantitative approach with a causal-associative design was applied, involving all 37 Generation Z employees through a saturated sampling technique. The collected data were processed using SPSS version 29 and analyzed through validity and reliability testing, classical assumption testing, multiple linear regression, partial (t) and simultaneous (F) hypothesis testing, as well as the coefficient of determination (R²). The findings indicate that each independent variable has a positive but statistically insignificant effect on work productivity when examined separately. However, the three variables jointly demonstrate a positive and statistically significant influence on employee productivity. The regression model accounts for 44.6% of the variance in work productivity, while the remaining 55.4% is explained by factors not included in this study.