Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Communication, Sustainability, and Empowerment
Maria Florencia Carballo Nievas
Orbis Iuris

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Cyberactivism and Open Source Intelligence (OSINT): Normative Standards for the Admissibility of Citizen-Gathered Digital Evidence in International Criminal Justice Maria Florencia Carballo Nievas
Journal of Communication, Sustainability, and Empowerment Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): CSE Journal
Publisher : Nusantara Society Lab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66679/cse.v2i3.34

Abstract

This article examines how the International Criminal Court evaluates citizen-gathered open source intelligence (OSINT). Through doctrinal legal research, it analyses the Rome Statute (Articles 21, 51–52, 64 and 66–69), the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Rules 63–64, 69 bis, 79 and 81), ICC case law up to the 2025 Yekatom and Ngaïssona judgment and the 2026 Duterte decision on the e-Court Protocol, comparative regimes, and the epistemology of machine testimony. The central problem, it argues, lies not in admissibility but in an “authentication deficit”: the absence of binding standards for deciding whether digitally derived evidence, once admitted, is trustworthy enough to bear the weight placed on it. The article proposes a six-element framework: cryptographic hashing at capture, anchored with an entity independent of the collector; standardised, disclosable chain-of-custody documentation open to challenge by the defence; a permissive inference of authenticity, displaceable by any specific challenge and placing no persuasive onus on the accused, as Article 67(1)(i) requires; source-protection safeguards tested against Articles 67(1)(e), 67(2) and 68(1); a duty to give reasons when departing from the Berkeley Protocol and the Leiden Guidelines; and a best-evidence requirement that operates as a safety valve and never excludes evidence. The framework is distributed across the e-Court Protocol, Regulations of the Court under Article 52 and provisional Rules under Article 51(3). It would narrow the authentication deficit without displacing free proof or burdening the defence, although it cannot establish what an item depicts, where or when it was recorded, or who made it.
Co-Authors