<![CDATA[Auditors are often faced with a decision that the result is not enough by a code of ethics and by generally acceptable accounting standards. A key consideration in the decision is ethical, although often involving multiple conflicts of interest. Judgment professional accountants can be corrupted by conflicts of interest. There are two conflicting interests, the real conflict and latent conflict. The purpose of this study was to analyze the significance of the effect of obedience pressure, task complexity on audit judgment and experience in public accounting in Surakarta and Yogyakarta partial and simultaneous This study is a survey of auditors in public accounting firm of Surakarta and Yogyakarta. The sampling technique used purposive sampling to sample 34 auditors. Analysis using the classical assumption of multiple linear regression analysis, F test, t test, the coefficient of determination. The results showed that the pressure obedience positive and significant impact on audit judgment of auditors in Surakarta and Yogyakarta with p value (0,000 < 0,05). The complexity of the task positive and significant impact on audit judgment of auditors in Surakarta and Yogyakarta with p value (0,017 < 0,05). Experience positive and significant impact on audit judgment of auditors in Surakarta and Yogyakarta with p value (0,034 < 0,05). Variable pressure obedience, task complexity and experience jointly influence on audit judgment (0,000 < 0,05). Keywords: obedience pressure, task complexity, experience, judgment audit]]>
