Maya Ika Trisnawati
UIN Walisongo Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Digital Transformation and Business Innovation: Examining the Role of Artificial Intelligence Capability in Enhancing Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Firm Performance Rovena Prroni; Sity Komalla; Alfa Rohmatin; Maya Ika Trisnawati
Journal of Economic and Business Advancement Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): : September: Ascendia: Journal of Economic and Business Advancement
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/439b3812

Abstract

Research on artificial intelligence (AI) and digital transformation has examined business innovation, competitive advantage, and sustainable firm performance, but these outcomes are frequently addressed through separate analytical perspectives. This study synthesizes the relationships among AI capability, business innovation, competitive advantage, and sustainable firm performance, emphasizing organizational mechanisms and differences in the underlying evidence. A structured integrative literature review was conducted using a purposively selected corpus of 19 scholarly publications published between 2020 and 2026. Publications were classified according to technological capability, organizational mechanisms, innovation outcomes, competitive implications, and sustainability-related performance. Directed qualitative synthesis and comparative evidence matrices were employed to identify recurring relationships and distinguish reported findings from broader conceptual interpretations. The reviewed literature associates AI capability with data-driven decision-making, process reconfiguration, organizational adaptability, and business model innovation. Competitive implications emerge through operational efficiency, dynamic capabilities, strategic differentiation, and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. Sustainability-related findings emphasize green innovation, knowledge integration, data-driven organizational culture, and sustainability-oriented business strategies. The synthesis identifies business innovation and complementary managerial capabilities as important explanatory mechanisms connecting AI resources with organizational outcomes. Its principal contribution is an integrated analytical framework distinguishing technological capabilities, organizational mechanisms, competitive outcomes, and sustainable performance without assuming a uniform causal sequence. Given the bounded literature corpus and heterogeneous research designs, the findings represent patterns of reported associations rather than pooled effects or generalizable causal estimates.    
Climate Rights Litigation and Constitutional Remedies in Southeast Asia Kongkon Bordoloi; Abi Umaroh; Maya Ika Trisnawati
International Journal of Law and Political Authority Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): : July: Corpus: International Journal of Law and Political Authority
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Climate litigation in Southeast Asia is developing through legal systems that differ sharply in constitutional text, standing doctrine, environmental procedure, and remedial technique. This article examines how rights-based climate claims can be translated into judicially manageable remedies through a comparative doctrinal analysis centered on Indonesia and the Philippines, with Malaysia and Singapore used as institutional comparators. The study codes constitutional provisions, environmental statutes, procedural rules, and leading judgments across six variables: rights basis, standing, causal framing, evidentiary pathway, remedial form, and post-judgment supervision. Indonesian doctrine combines Article 28H(1), Article 33(4), environmental legislation, and citizen-suit practice, while Philippine law couples the constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology with specialized remedies including the writ of kalikasan and continuing mandamus. The comparison shows that the principal regional constraint is not recognition of environmental interests but the conversion of diffuse climate harm into reviewable governmental duties and enforceable orders. The article proposes a calibrated remedial model linking the intensity of judicial relief to the specificity of the breached legal duty, evidentiary certainty, institutional competence, and the need for continuing supervision.