Discourse on Christian early childhood education in Indonesia has tended to frame screen technology as a threat to be managed primarily through duration limits and supervision. This article argues that such an approach narrows the very health guidelines it invokes, which also emphasize content quality, co-viewing, sleep, and physical activity, and that it overlooks the direction of contemporary research, which has increasingly moved from asking whether screens are harmful to examining the conditions under which their use becomes problematic. Through an integrative literature review of empirical studies relevant to early childhood, this article shows that screen effects are partly mediated by sleep and physical activity (in school-aged children) and are associated with disrupted joint attention and parental technoference in early childhood, so that they cannot be explained by screen exposure alone. Empirical research, however, cannot determine the normative criteria by which a context of use should be considered good for child development. Drawing on a mutual critical correlation approach, this article places these findings in dialogue with 1 Corinthians 10:23–24, Genesis 1:28, Deuteronomy 6:6–7, Luke 2:52, Proverbs 26:4–5, and Philippians 4:6–7, and proposes the concept of stewardly presence, defined through three interrelated criteria: edifying, shared, and wise. This framework shifts theological responsibility from controlling screen duration toward the quality of adult presence that is responsive to children as subjects, and translates it into a practical reflective tool for Christian families, early childhood educators, and church ministries serving children. Abstract Wacana pendidikan Kristen anak usia dini di Indonesia cenderung memperlakukan teknologi layar sebagai ancaman yang terutama dikelola melalui pembatasan durasi dan pengawasan. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa pendekatan tersebut mempersempit pedoman kesehatan anak yang dirujuknya, yang juga menekankan kualitas konten, pendampingan, tidur, dan aktivitas fisik, serta kurang menangkap arah riset kontemporer yang semakin bergerak dari pertanyaan "apakah layar berbahaya" menuju "dalam kondisi apa layar berbahaya". Melalui tinjauan literatur integratif atas studi empiris yang relevan bagi anak usia dini, artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa dampak layar sebagian dimediasi oleh tidur dan aktivitas fisik (pada anak usia sekolah), serta berkaitan dengan terganggunya joint attention dan technoference orang tua pada anak usia dini, sehingga tidak dapat dijelaskan hanya oleh keberadaan layar itu sendiri. Namun, riset empiris tidak dapat menyediakan kriteria normatif tentang konteks penggunaan yang baik. Dengan pendekatan korelasi kritis timbal balik, artikel ini membaca temuan tersebut melalui 1 Korintus 10:23–24, Kejadian 1:28, Ulangan 6:6–7, Lukas 2:52, Amsal 26:4–5, dan Filipi 4:6–7, lalu mengusulkan konsep kehadiran penatalayanan dengan tiga kriteria: membangun, bersama, dan berhikmat. Konsep ini menggeser tanggung jawab teologis dari pengendalian durasi kepada kualitas kehadiran orang dewasa yang responsif terhadap anak sebagai subjek, dan diterjemahkan menjadi alat refleksi praktis bagi keluarga, guru PAUD Kristen, dan pelayanan anak gereja.