<![CDATA[Façade maintenance is often neglected and seems imprecise due to many factors, one of whichis the location of the facade which is quite difficult to reach. Whereas maintenance on the facade is veryimportant because the facade is the earliest part that is seen from a building and becomes a characteristicof the building, the maintenance applied should not be modest, but must be optimal and heed the relevantregulations. This study reviews by comparing and assessing the maintenance of the facade of the curtainwall material and aluminium composite panel with the Minister of Public Works Regulation No.24/PRT/M/2008. Data collection methods used are interviews and questionnaires and to analyse usingqualitative descriptive methods and percentages. From this method, it is possible to investigate thecomparison of procedures in the field with procedures based on Permen PU No.24/PRT/M/2008 and thelevel of conformity of the procedures under review. Based on the results of the comparative analysis, thetwo procedures have similarities and differences, the procedures in the field as a whole are not inaccordance with the procedures for the Minister of Public Works No. 24/PRT/M/2008, but the proceduresin the field also have their own advantages. Based on the assessment, the level of conformity of theprocedures in the field with the Minister of Public Works No. 24/PRT/M/2008 overall reached 86.64%.Meanwhile, based on the grouping of respondents, the score was 66.17% for group I, 78.95% for group IIand 91.14% for group III. The overall results stated that the maintenance carried out was not fully inaccordance with the regulations, but the results obtained showed good results, where the percentageobtained was more than 50%, this indicates that more than half of the maintenance was carried out byheeding the regulations]]>
