Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi
Kholifatul Muna
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Dissenting Opinion sebagai Manifestasi Hukum Progresif dalam Menjaga Integritas Pemilu: Dissenting Opinions as a Manifestation of Progressive Law in Safeguarding Electoral Integrity Aditya Andela Pratama; Kholifatul Muna
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 23 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2328

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s decisions in disputes over the results of the 2024 presidential election, which contained dissenting opinions, highlight the need to reconcile substantive justice with electoral integrity. This study analyzes whether the decisions reflect progressive legal principles and progressive interpretation, as well as their constitutional implications for democracy. This research uses a normative juridical method, with Constitutional Court Decision No. 1/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 and No. 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 as primary legal materials. The findings show that elements of progressive law appear in the dissenting opinions of three constitutional justices, who emphasized substantive justice and constitutional morality in resolving electoral disputes. Although the decisions did not alter the election results and the dissenting opinions are not legally binding, they strengthen discourse on electoral integrity. The decisions also indicate the need for electoral law reform and reaffirm the Constitutional Court’s role in safeguarding substantive democracy.
Co-Authors Aditya Andela Pratama