<![CDATA[The climate change debate has been politicized to a worrisome level. Research shows a divide along conservative and liberal lines in the American political landscape regarding those who believe in the reality of anthropogenic climate change on the one hand and those who are sceptical about the existence of a clearly defined nexus between man and negative climate catastrophes on the other. Climate change skeptics seem to be members of the far-right while climate change believers seem to consist of the left regardless of the society being scrutinized. While climate change deniers keep being difficult, key figures like activist Greta Thunberg keep pushing the narratives of a better world for the next generation by cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental politics and governance must find sanity in the middle. Using the doctrinal research method, this paper dissects climate change skepticism through the Nigerian prism. The finding is clear: the climate change debate is now a political reality and must be treated as such with clear governmental policies to combat the problem. The research finding shows that the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NiMet) is the agency responsible for tackling climate issues and weather challenges in Nigeria. The agency has a herculean task ahead of them but it takes collaborative effort to succeed. The annual Seasonal Climate Prediction (SCP) published regularly by NiMet seems to be the best attempt at tilting the balance of scepticism through adequate information dissemination.]]>
