Azma Nur Fitriani
STIKes Muhammadiyah Ciamis

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effect of Parenting Style on Family Emotional Regulation Rania Herdiani Putri; Adelia Indrianti; Azma Nur Fitriani; Yanti Srinayanti; Lilis Lismayanti; Purnama Gandara; Rosmiati Rosmiati
Genius Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): GENIUS JOURNAL
Publisher : Inspirasi Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56359/gj.v7i1.826

Abstract

Introduction: Parenting styles significantly influence emotional regulation and psychological well-being within families. Supportive parenting enhances emotional skills, whereas unresponsive parenting may lead to tension in family relationships. Objective: This review aims to analyze the impact of parenting styles on emotional regulation within families and its implications for the emotional well-being of family members. Method: This review employed a structured search strategy across four databases, PubMed, ProQuest, Garuda, and JSTOR to identify studies on the influence of parenting styles on emotional regulation in families from 2015 to 2024. The population included parents and children, with parenting styles measured using the PSDQ and emotional regulation using the ERC. Three independent reviewers conducted the selection process following the PRISMA Flow Chart, and article quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist. Extracted data included authors, intervention types, settings, session frequency and duration, as well as the methods and media used. Result: Based on 11 studies with 6,835 participants from Indonesia, Australia, Iran, China, Nigeria, Romania, Palestine, and India, parenting styles significantly influenced emotional regulation and well-being. The authoritative style had positive effects, while permissive and authoritarian styles had negative impacts. Parental emotional regulation, education, and cultural values were moderating factors. Interactive interventions over 6-12 sessions within 4-12 weeks were most effective. Conclusion: Authoritative parenting fosters children's emotional regulation and pro-social behavior, whereas authoritarian and permissive styles are associated with negative outcomes. Therefore, parenting education and family therapy are essential to promoting authoritative parenting styles to support children's emotional well-being.
Effectiveness of Parenting styles on Psychosocial among Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review Adelia Indrianti; Azma Nur Fitriani; Hani Septiani; Rania Herdiani Putri; Diny Nur Fauziah; Lilis Lismayanti
Genius Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): GENIUS JOURNAL
Publisher : Inspirasi Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56359/gj.v7i1.827

Abstract

Introduction: Parenting styles play a crucial role in adolescents’ psychosocial development, including emotional health, social relationships, and cognitive growth. The manner in which parents nurture their children can influence adolescents’ levels of anxiety and depression. Parenting that is authoritative tends to promote better mental health, while an authoritarian style is commonly related to an increased risk of psychological problems. Objective: This systematic review seeks to investigate the impact of various parenting styles authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful on the psychosocial well-being of adolescents. Method: The literature review included studies published from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2024, which were sourced from four different databases: PubMed, ProQuest, JSTOR, and Garuda. The target population was adolescents aged 11 to 19 years. Parenting styles were evaluated using the Parental Authority Questionnaire (PAQ), while mental health outcomes were assessed through various instruments, This included measures such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28), Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument, Version 2 (MAYSI-2), and the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Three reviewers independently carried out article screening, data extraction, and quality assessment, following the PRISMA framework. Study quality was further appraised using the CASP checklist. The extracted information included author details, type of intervention, facilitator, research setting, number and length of sessions, as well as the methods or media employed. Result: A total of nine articles involving 2,036 participants were included. The results indicate that parenting styles have a notable influence on adolescents’ psychosocial well-being. Adolescents with authoritative parents showed higher psychological flexibility, whereas those with authoritarian parents experienced increased anxiety, depression, and socio-emotional challenges. Conclusion: The review concludes that authoritative parenting is the most effective approach for promoting adolescents’ psychosocial well-being. It enhances self-esteem and psychological flexibility while lowering anxiety and depression. Parenting education and targeted interventions should therefore be encouraged in clinical practice to foster authoritative parenting and promote adolescents’ mental well-being.