Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education Technology and Civic Literacy (JET CIVIL)
Aaliyah Nazhifa
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGEMBANGAN KEMAMPUAN ANALITIS MAHASISWA DALAM MEMBANDINGKAN SISTEM HUKUM ADAT DI BERBAGAI DAERAH DI INDONESIA Danialsyah Danialsyah; Alfikra Bayhaqi Tarigan; Aldi Fattah Pontoh; Rafly Haiqal Prawira Lubis; Haykal Faridz Adrianto; Try Rezki Kurniawan; Ayub Bestari; Aaliyah Nazhifa; Muhammad Rizki
Journal of Education Technology and Civic Literacy (JET CIVIL) Vol 7, No 1 (2026): Edisi Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/jetcivil.v7i1.14508

Abstract

Indonesia’s legal pluralism requires law students to develop comparative analytical skills to understand the similarities, differences, and applications of various customary law systems. However, these skills still require strengthening through systematic learning. This study aims to assess and develop the comparative analytical skills of fifth-semester students in the Law Study Program at Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara in the Customary Law course. The study employed a quantitative approach using a one-group pretest–posttest pre-experimental design. All nine fifth-semester students from Class C in the 2026/1 academic year were included through total sampling. The research instrument was a comparative analytical test covering the identification of characteristics, analysis of similarities and differences, evaluation of strengths and weaknesses, and synthesis of customary law systems within the context of Indonesian legal pluralism. Expert validation yielded an average validity index of 0.87. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and N-Gain. The results revealed a significant improvement in comparative analytical skills (Z = −2.67; p = 0.008), with an N-Gain of 0.63 (moderate category). These findings indicate the potential of systematic comparative learning to strengthen students’ customary law reasoning. The study recommends enhancing cross-system customary law analysis, particularly in understanding the relationships among legal norms, institutions, and community practices, although its causal effectiveness requires further examination using a comparison group.
Co-Authors Aldi Fattah Pontoh Alfikra Bayhaqi Tarigan Ayub Bestari Danial Syah Haykal Faridz Adrianto Muhammad Rizki Rafly Haiqal Prawira Lubis Try Rezki Kurniawan