Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Indonesia Discourse
Rani Putri Andini
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Myth of Digital Inclusion: Does Indonesia’s Digital Economy Empower the Poor or Repackage Inequality? Rani Putri Andini; Asadullah Nur Hamzah
Indonesia Discourse Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): July-December, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/indi.v3i2.65511

Abstract

Digital transformation is frequently presented as a mechanism for expanding economic opportunity, improving financial inclusion, and enabling disadvantaged populations to participate in new markets. In Indonesia, the growth of digital commerce, financial technology, and platform-mediated entrepreneurship has intensified expectations that technological access can support poverty reduction and economic empowerment. However, access to digital infrastructure does not automatically translate into equal capabilities, bargaining power, or economic returns. This study proposes to examine the conditions under which participation in Indonesia’s digital economy expands opportunities or reproduces existing socioeconomic inequalities. A mixed-methods design would combine secondary-data analysis, policy review, and qualitative case studies of microenterprises and low-income digital workers. Where suitable data are available, the quantitative component would examine associations between digital participation and selected economic indicators, while the qualitative component would investigate platform fees, digital literacy, access to capital, market dependence, and the capacity to retain economic value. The analytical framework integrates the digital divide literature, capability theory, and political economy approaches to inequality. The research would distinguish between access to technology, effective use, and measurable socioeconomic outcomes rather than treating digital inclusion as a single condition. Its anticipated contribution is a more differentiated understanding of digital development in an emerging economy, challenging assumptions that technological participation necessarily produces empowerment. The findings could inform policies that connect digital infrastructure investment with skills development, fair platform governance, and targeted support for economically marginalized groups.
The Myth of Digital Inclusion: Does Indonesia’s Digital Economy Empower the Poor or Repackage Inequality? Rani Putri Andini; Asadullah Nur Hamzah
Indonesia Discourse Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): July-December, 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/indi.v3i2.65511

Abstract

Digital transformation is frequently presented as a mechanism for expanding economic opportunity, improving financial inclusion, and enabling disadvantaged populations to participate in new markets. In Indonesia, the growth of digital commerce, financial technology, and platform-mediated entrepreneurship has intensified expectations that technological access can support poverty reduction and economic empowerment. However, access to digital infrastructure does not automatically translate into equal capabilities, bargaining power, or economic returns. This study proposes to examine the conditions under which participation in Indonesia’s digital economy expands opportunities or reproduces existing socioeconomic inequalities. A mixed-methods design would combine secondary-data analysis, policy review, and qualitative case studies of microenterprises and low-income digital workers. Where suitable data are available, the quantitative component would examine associations between digital participation and selected economic indicators, while the qualitative component would investigate platform fees, digital literacy, access to capital, market dependence, and the capacity to retain economic value. The analytical framework integrates the digital divide literature, capability theory, and political economy approaches to inequality. The research would distinguish between access to technology, effective use, and measurable socioeconomic outcomes rather than treating digital inclusion as a single condition. Its anticipated contribution is a more differentiated understanding of digital development in an emerging economy, challenging assumptions that technological participation necessarily produces empowerment. The findings could inform policies that connect digital infrastructure investment with skills development, fair platform governance, and targeted support for economically marginalized groups.
Co-Authors Asadullah Nur Hamzah