May Tesalonika
Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

ENVIRONMENTAL AND GREEN ACCOUNTING PRACTICES AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: INDONESIAN LISTED MANUFACTURERS May Tesalonika; Hendrik E.S Samosir; Ardin Dolok Saribu
Jurnal Comparative: Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): August
Publisher : Univesitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/combis.v7i3.14638

Abstract

This study examines the impact of green accounting and environmental performance on financial performance, focusing on mining-sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2021 to 2023. Using purposive sampling, 30 firms met the inclusion criteria. The research employs quantitative methods with secondary data collected from annual financial reports and sustainability disclosures. Green accounting is measured by environmental costs, while environmental performance is proxied by the PROPER (Program for Pollution Control, Evaluation, and Rating) rating. Financial performance is assessed using Return on Assets (ROA). Data analysis using SmartPls 3.0. The results indicate that green accounting has no significant effect on financial performance, and environmental performance does not significantly influence financial outcomes. The coefficient of determination (R²) reveals that the independent variables explain only 1% of the variation in financial performance, suggesting that other factors play a more dominant role. These findings imply that current environmental cost reporting and regulatory ratings like PROPER may not yet translate into measurable financial benefits for mining-related manufacturers in Indonesia. The study contributes to the growing literature on sustainability accounting in emerging markets, highlighting the gap between environmental initiatives and financial returns. Future research should incorporate additional variables such as ESG scores, corporate governance, or carbon emissions, and extend the time frame and sample size to enhance generalizability.