Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluating the Performance of Voting Classifier in Multiclass Classification of Dry Bean Varieties I Putu Adi Pratama; Ery Setiyawan Jullev Atmadji; Dwi Amalia Purnamasar; Edi Faizal
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : Yocto Brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v5i1.124

Abstract

This study explores the application of a voting classifier, integrating Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, and Gaussian Naive Bayes models, for the multiclass classification of dry bean varieties. Utilizing a dataset comprising 13,611 images of dry bean grains, captured through a high-resolution computer vision system, we extracted 16 features to train and test the classifier. Through a rigorous 5-fold cross-validation process, we assessed the model's performance, focusing on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The results demonstrated significant variability in the classifier's performance across different data subsets, with accuracy rates fluctuating between 31.23% and 96.73%. This variability highlights the classifier's potential under specific conditions while also indicating areas for improvement. The research contributes to the agricultural informatics field by showcasing the effectiveness and challenges of using ensemble learning methods for crop variety classification, a crucial task for enhancing agricultural productivity and food security. Recommendations for future research include exploring additional features to improve model generalization, extending the dataset for broader applicability, and comparing the voting classifier's performance with other ensemble methods or advanced machine learning models. This study underscores the importance of machine learning in advancing agricultural classification tasks, paving the way for more efficient and accurate crop sorting and grading processes.
Comparative Analysis of Gradient-Based Optimizers in Feedforward Neural Networks for Titanic Survival Prediction I Putu Adi Pratama; Ni Wayan Jeri Kusuma Dewi
Indonesian Journal of Data and Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Data and Science
Publisher : Yocto Brain

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56705/ijodas.v6i1.219

Abstract

Introduction: Feedforward Neural Networks (FNNs), or Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), are widely recognized for their capacity to model complex nonlinear relationships. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various gradient-based optimization algorithms in training FNNs for Titanic survival prediction, a binary classification task on structured tabular data. Methods: The Titanic dataset consisting of 891 passenger records was pre-processed via feature selection, encoding, and normalization. Three FNN architectures—small ([64, 32, 16]), medium ([128, 64, 32]), and large ([256, 128, 64])—were trained using eight gradient-based optimizers: BGD, SGD, Mini-Batch GD, NAG, Heavy Ball, Adam, RMSprop, and Nadam. Regularization techniques such as dropout and L2 penalty, along with batch normalization and Leaky ReLU activation, were applied. Training was conducted with and without a dynamic learning rate scheduler, and model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and cross-entropy loss. Results: The Adam optimizer combined with the medium architecture achieved the highest accuracy of 82.68% and an F1-score of 0.77 when using a learning rate scheduler. RMSprop and Nadam also performed competitively. Models without learning rate schedulers generally showed reduced performance and slower convergence. Smaller architectures trained faster but yielded lower accuracy, while larger architectures offered marginal gains at the cost of computational efficiency. Conclusions: Adam demonstrated superior performance among the tested optimizers, especially when coupled with learning rate scheduling. These findings highlight the importance of optimizer choice and learning rate adaptation in enhancing FNN performance on tabular datasets. Future research should explore additional architectures and optimization strategies for broader generalizability