Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Education and Social Science (IJESS)
Adilita Pramanti
Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Climate Crisis and Social Inequality: Resilience of Vulnerable Communities Facing Recurrent Disasters in Indonesia Syamsiah Badruddin; Adilita Pramanti; Paisal Halim
IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): VOL 7 NO 1 APRIL 2026
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL PENELITI EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN TEKNOLOGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/ijess.v7i1.790

Abstract

The climate crisis does not produce socially uniform impacts. Intensifying hydrometeorological hazards interact with poverty, asset inequality, housing quality, access to services, gender and age inequalities, employment status, and institutional capacity, causing socially vulnerable groups to experience greater losses and slower recovery. This article examines how recurrent disasters can transform community resilience from a learning process into a process of capacity erosion. The study employs a structured integrative review and secondary-data synthesis focused on Indonesia with global comparative evidence. The core literature comprises 40 sources selected for substantive relevance, traceability, publisher quality, and methodological strength; 20 are peer-reviewed international journal articles published between September 2023 and 2026. Current data are drawn primarily from WMO, BNPB, BPS-Statistics Indonesia, UNDRR, IPCC, and the World Bank. Four principal findings emerge. First, repeated exposure does not automatically strengthen resilience; when the interval between shocks is shorter than the time required for recovery, asset losses, debt, livelihood disruption, and impaired social functioning can accumulate. Second, social inequality acts as a risk multiplier by limiting households' ability to mitigate hazards, access assistance, and convert experience into adaptive investment. Third, social capital is essential but finite; recent longitudinal evidence indicates that cumulative disaster exposure can erode bonding social capital, social support, and social functioning. Fourth, adaptive social protection, inclusive governance, risk financing, and ex-ante investment can interrupt cumulative vulnerability. The article's principal novelty is the Cumulative Vulnerability-Resilience Spiral (CVRS), a framework connecting structural inequality, recurrent exposure, recovery debt, depletion of livelihood and social capital, and greater vulnerability to subsequent shocks. The framework advances a dynamic, distributive, and justice-oriented approach to measuring resilience and designing disaster policy in Indonesia. Keywords: climate crisis; social inequality; community resilience; recurrent disasters; vulnerability; adaptive social protection; climate justice.
Patriarchal Hegemony and Women’s Triple Roles in Indonesia: An Integrative Review of Unpaid Work, Power Relations, and Agency Muthia Amelia; Syamsiah Badruddin; Adilita Pramanti
IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): VOL 7 NO 2 OCTOBER 2026
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL PENELITI EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN TEKNOLOGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/ijess.v7i2.792

Abstract

This article revises and sharpens an earlier discussion of patriarchal hegemony and women’s triple roles in Indonesia by removing unsupported causal generalizations and replacing questionable references with traceable sources. The study uses an integrative literature review and thematic synthesis of 35 verified sources: 28 peer-reviewed journal articles (24 published in reputable international journals), three academic books, and four institutional reports. Empirical studies from 2019–2026 are prioritized, while foundational works are retained for conceptual purposes. The analysis combines Moser’s triple-role framework, structural accounts of patriarchy and gendered organizations, and Kabeer’s resources agency achievements approach. Four patterns emerge. First, women’s participation in productive work does not automatically reduce reproductive and community responsibilities, producing time poverty and mental load. Second, inequality is sustained not only by cultural norms but also by childcare shortages, workplace design, urban mobility, and unequal household authority. Third, expanded access to education and employment does not necessarily translate into equivalent control over time, income, assets, and strategic decisions. Fourth, women exercise agency through household negotiation, economic resources, leadership, and digital counterpublics, yet such agency remains stratified by class, life-course position, and institutional support. The article proposes a redistribution control gap to explain why expanded access may outpace the redistribution of care and the equalization of decision-making power. Policy implications emphasize recognizing, reducing, redistributing, rewarding, and representing care work through childcare services, work family policy, time-use data, and survivor-centered protection.
Who Bears the Burden of Indonesia's Waste Emergency? Risk Society, Governance Capacity Gaps, and the Crisis of Ecological Citizenship Adilita Pramanti; Syamsiah Badruddin
IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): VOL 7 NO 1 APRIL 2026
Publisher : INTERNATIONAL PENELITI EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN TEKNOLOGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/ijess.v7i1.795

Abstract

Indonesia is facing a recurring waste emergency in which the accumulation of municipal solid waste increasingly exceeds the capacity of local systems to collect, process, and safely dispose of it. This is not merely a technical failure of waste management infrastructure, but a sociological problem concerning who is exposed to waste-related risks, who has access to adequate services, who bears the costs of governance gaps, and whose voice is represented in decision-making. Official data illustrate the scale of the problem: the Ministry of Environment reported 56.63 million tonnes of waste generation in 2023, with 60.99% unmanaged, while SIPSN recorded 34.21 million tonnes in 2024 from 317 districts and cities, with 40.26% classified as unmanaged. By the end of 2025, 336 districts and cities had been identified as experiencing waste emergencies. This article employs an integrative literature review and policy document analysis to examine how waste risks are produced, distributed, and governed. The analysis integrates risk society, environmental justice, governance capacity gaps, and ecological citizenship. Findings indicate that waste emergencies reflect cumulative environmental and health risks, unequal exposure and service access, fragmented coordination, weak institutional capacity and enforcement, and the reduction of citizenship to behavioral responsibility. The article proposes a triple burden of waste emergency framework comprising exposure burden, service burden, and voice burden, arguing that a just transition requires redistributing not only waste flows, but also institutional responsibilities, resources, decision-making power, and protection.
Co-Authors Halim, Paisal Muthia Amelia Syamsiah Badruddin