Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara
Kurniawan
Indonesian Aviation Polytechnic
Aerospace Engineering Earth & Planetary Sciences Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DOCTRINE TESTING FROM A COMPLEX SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES IN THE AXIOM-BASED DOCTRINE TESTING MODEL AND SYSTEM RESILIENCE Farrid Hidayat; Suroso; Kurniawan; Hidayadtullah; Muchammad Furqon; Tutikurniadinda; Rickydika; Nanda Fariedata
Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Triwulan Kedua
Publisher : Staf Komunikasi dan Elektronika, TNI Angkatan Udara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62828/jpb.v5i2.213

Abstract

This study aims to methodologically analyze the limitations of conventional doc trine testing approaches and compare them with contemporary complex systems-based approaches, using doctrinal axioms and system resilience as the basis for evaluation. Operational doctrine is traditionally tested through conventional approaches that emphasize normative compliance, historical precedent, and limited scenario-based simulations. This approach is based on the assumption of strategic and operational environmental stability and the linearity of cause-and-effect relationships. However, the dynamics of contemporary strategic and operational environments which are non-linear, adaptive, and produce emergent effects demonstrate a methodological gap between the reality of the system encountered and the doctrine testing mechanisms employed. The study uses a conceptual qualitative approach through a systemic-doctrinal analysis with a comparative method of epistemic assumptions, testing logic, and validity criteria of both approaches. The analysis shows that the conventional approach is prone to pseudo-validity because it assesses doctrine primarily based on procedural compliance, rather than systemic resilience to environmental change and operational disruption. In contrast, the contemporary approach offers a more structurally consistent evaluation framework in addressing the complexity of the strategic and operational environment. Therefore, doctrine testing needs to be reoriented from a normative verification model to a complex systems-based evaluation model as a structural methodological necessity. This research contributes to the development of a doctrine evaluation methodology that is more relevant to the study of contemporary defense doctrine and strategy.
BITCOIN AS A SYSTEM THAT RESISTS RECOVERY A NON-LINEAR SYSTEM DESIGN STUDY ON SCARCITY AND SECURITY Farrid Hidayat; Suroso; Kurniawan; Hidayadtullah; Muchammad Furqon; Farrithullah; Dikatamasania; Adhi Sudibiyo
Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Jurnal TNI Angkatan Udara Triwulan Kedua
Publisher : Staf Komunikasi dan Elektronika, TNI Angkatan Udara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62828/jpb.v5i2.215

Abstract

This study aims to structurally examine why loss of access to Bitcoin is permanent and to assess claims regarding the possibility of recovery, master keys, or backdoors in the Bitcoin system. This study departs from the general trend that positions Bitcoin solely as a monetary innovation, while its most radical aspect lies in its system design. Bitcoin is analyzed as a non-linear formal system that defines ownership through cryptographic facts, rather than through identity, intent, or social context. The methodology used is a conceptual-design analysis based on cryptographic studies, protocol architecture, empirical precedents of human error, and the implications of network consensus. The main results demonstrate that irreversibility and loss of access are not system failures, but rather direct consequences of Bitcoin's design axioms, which tie ownership to high-entropy private keys and reject all forms of discretionary authority. The analysis also shows that claims of backdoors, whether mathematical, implemental, hardware, or temporal, are structurally incoherent without undermining the fundamental assumptions of cryptography and decentralized consensus. The study's conclusions affirm that Bitcoin's resilience stems not from adaptive flexibility but from deliberate rule rigidity. This research's contribution lies in mapping Bitcoin as a system design artifact that resists recovery, while also expanding the Bitcoin discourse from the monetary realm to the study of system design, applied cryptography, and the philosophy of technology.
Co-Authors Adhi Sudibiyo Dikatamasania Farrid Hidayat Farrithullah Hidayadtullah Muchammad Furqon Nanda Fariedata Rickydika Suroso Tutikurniadinda