<![CDATA[Cross-border electronic commerce enables consumers to purchase goods and services from businesses located in other countries, but it also creates legal uncertainty when disputes arise over defective products, non-delivery, misleading information, payment, or unfair contractual terms. This article examines the legal protection of consumers in cross-border e-commerce through the perspective of international private law, focusing on international jurisdiction and the determination of applicable law. It uses doctrinal legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis considers Indonesian consumer and electronic transaction legislation alongside the European Union’s Brussels I Recast and Rome I frameworks, relevant Hague instruments, and international soft-law standards. The study finds that consumer protection depends not only on substantive rights but also on whether consumers can bring claims before an accessible court and rely on mandatory protections that cannot be waived through standard-form terms. The European Union provides a relatively structured protective model through consumer jurisdiction and choice-of-law rules, particularly where a trader directs commercial activities to the consumer’s country. Indonesia recognizes electronic contracts and requires specified contractual information, including choice-of-law provisions, but cross-border enforcement and coordination of jurisdiction remain challenging. The article argues for a consumer-oriented connecting factor based on the consumer’s habitual residence where the trader purposefully targets that market, limits on pre-dispute forum and law-selection clauses, stronger platform accountability, and accessible cross-border dispute resolution. These measures can improve predictability while preserving legitimate party autonomy.]]>
