This Author published in this journals
All Journal Interaction
Olusegun Oladele Jegede
Department of Languages and Literature, Lead City University, Ibadan

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Pemosisian Ideologis “We” dalam Konstruksi Solidaritas dan Identitas pada Pidato Kemenangan Boris Johnson dalam Pemilu 2019 Olusegun Oladele Jegede
Interaction: Jurnal Sosiologi Komunikasi Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Komunikasi, Kuasa, dan Rasa Memiliki
Publisher : Danudirja Setyabudi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64271/h2mbs360

Abstract

This study examined how the pronoun we constructs solidarity and identity in Boris Johnson’s 2019 election victory speech, addressing the limited scholarly attention to pronouns’ dual ideological functions in post-election political rhetoric. The specific objectives were to determine the frequency of we in the speech, examine its ideological construction of solidarity, and explore its ideological construction of identity. The study was anchored in Critical Discourse Analysis, which explains how linguistic choices reflect power relations and social meaning. The research adopted a qualitative design supported by a limited quantitative frequency analysis. The study purposively selected the speech because of its political relevance and communicative significance. The analysis identified 29 occurrences of we: 19 instances (66%) primarily associated with solidarity and 10 (34%) primarily associated with identity. The findings also indicate that some instances perform both functions, with the reported categories representing their primary ideological function. Solidarity was constructed through shared responsibility, national unity, collective action, and political alignment, particularly in relation to governance and the resolution of Brexit. Identity expressions mainly functioned to establish collective political and national belonging and to legitimize governmental authority. The study concludes that pronoun use operates as an ideological resource for consolidating political legitimacy and reducing the distance between leadership and the electorate. The study contributes to understanding how pronoun use in electoral victory speeches jointly constructs solidarity and identity.