<![CDATA[Penelitian ini mengkaji tren global literasi matematika selama 2000–2025 dalam mendukung Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), mengidentifikasi peneliti berpengaruh, serta memetakan tema dominan dan arah riset. Pendekatan kuantitatif-deskriptif berbasis metadata bibliografi digunakan dengan interpretasi kualitatif. Artikel dari Dimensions diseleksi menggunakan PRISMA dan dipetakan melalui VOSviewer. Publikasi meningkat tajam sejak 2018, seiring perhatian terhadap PISA dan pendidikan berkualitas. Analisis network, overlay, dan density mengidentifikasi empat fokus: literasi matematis siswa, kemampuan guru, faktor afektif-psikologis siswa (self-efficacy), serta kebijakan pendidikan dan kesetaraan (equity). Kolaborasi masih bersifat regional, dengan kontribusi signifikan dari Asia, terutama Indonesia. Temuan memperjelas arah dan struktur intelektual riset literasi matematika global. Keterbatasannya adalah penggunaan satu basis data (Dimensions) dan analisis deskriptif. Penelitian selanjutnya disarankan menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik kuantitatif lanjutan untuk memperoleh temuan lebih komprehensif dan mendukung inferensi lebih luas.Kata kunci: Mathematical Literacy, Quality Education, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer, PRISMAAbstract: This study examines global mathematical literacy research during 2000–2025 in support of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), identifies influential researchers, and maps dominant themes and research directions. A quantitative-descriptive approach based on bibliographic metadata is combined with qualitative interpretation. Articles from Dimensions are selected using PRISMA and mapped with VOSviewer. Publications increased sharply from 2018, alongside growing attention to PISA and quality education. Network, overlay, and density analyses identify four focuses: student mathematical literacy, teacher competencies, students’ affective-psychological factors (self-efficacy), and educational policy and equity. Collaboration remains regional, with significant contributions from Asia, particularly Indonesia. The findings clarify the direction and intellectual structure of global mathematical literacy research. Limitations include reliance on one database (Dimensions) and descriptive analysis. Future studies should employ advanced quantitative bibliometric approaches for more comprehensive findings and broader inferences.Keywords: Mathematical literacy, Quality education, Bibliometric analysis, VOSviewer, PRISMA]]>
