<![CDATA[Continuity of care for schizophrenia is challenged by treatment disengagement, delayed recognition of relapse, and barriers to in-person follow-up. This evidence-informed narrative review critically examines tele-psychiatric nursing and digital remote monitoring, distinguishing nurse-delivered care from automated and multicomponent interventions. Targeted searches of publicly accessible PubMed records, publisher websites, and citation links were performed in October 2026 for English-language evidence published no later than December 2025. Randomized trials, longitudinal and qualitative studies, evidence syntheses, and relevant guidance were examined using a design-sensitive narrative matrix; no quantitative meta-analysis or systematic screening counts were undertaken. Small schizophrenia-specific randomized trials suggest benefits of structured telephone nursing for medication-related adherence, attitudes, or quality of life, but effects on self-efficacy and longer-term clinical outcomes are uncertain. Multicomponent digital and community interventions yield context-dependent findings, and a 2025 meta-analysis of 26 randomized studies found no significant pooled effects across major outcomes. Active monitoring with clinical triage appears feasible, whereas passive sensing has heterogeneous measurement and insufficient prospective clinical validation. Important implementation concerns include therapeutic alliance, consent, surveillance-related distress, digital exclusion, staff workload, and response accountability. The evidence supports a hybrid, person-centred model in which nurses interpret monitoring information through dialogue, use explicit escalation pathways, and preserve accessible face-to-face alternatives. Future pragmatic trials should isolate the contribution of nursing support and evaluate independently adjudicated relapse, functioning, safety, equity, and implementation costs.]]>
