<![CDATA[Community-based waste management in Barurambat Timur Urban Village faces institutionalization challenges, particularly regarding the unsustained participation of youth and reports of additional payments to waste collection workers. This study analyzes these challenges using Ansell and Gash's four-dimensional framework—starting conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, and collaborative process—to examine how weaknesses in formal rules trigger field-level issues. Employing a qualitative case study approach, data were collected from September to December 2025 through documentation and in-depth interviews with 13 purposively selected informants, including representatives from the Environmental Service, urban village officials, TPS3R managers, waste collection workers, and residents, and subsequently analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model. The findings indicate that TPS3R waste collection operations run routinely; however, community participation remains passive and largely confined to fee payment. Karang Taruna’s involvement is hindered by the absence of a permanent waste bank manager, while the lack of written standard operating procedures gives rise to informal additional payments when waste volumes surge. The novelty of this study demonstrates that smooth operational routines do not automatically reflect mature collaborative governance. Implications suggest that strengthening governance requires establishing transparent service standards and institutionalizing youth participation in a structured manner.Pengelolaan sampah berbasis komunitas di Kelurahan Barurambat Timur menghadapi tantangan pelembagaan, khususnya terkait belum berkelanjutannya partisipasi pemuda dan munculnya laporan imbalan tambahan petugas. Penelitian ini menganalisis tantangan tersebut menggunakan kerangka empat dimensi Ansell dan Gash yang meliputi kondisi awal, desain kelembagaan, kepemimpinan fasilitatif, dan proses kolaboratif untuk membedah bagaimana kelemahan aturan formal memicu permasalahan lapangan. Melalui pendekatan studi kasus kualitatif, data dikumpulkan dari September hingga Desember 2025 melalui dokumentasi dan wawancara mendalam terhadap 13 informan purposif yang meliputi perwakilan Dinas Lingkungan Hidup, aparatur kelurahan, pengelola TPS3R, petugas kebersihan, serta warga, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model interaktif Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan operasional pengangkutan sampah TPS3R berjalan rutin, tetapi partisipasi warga masih pasif sebatas pembayaran iuran. Pelibatan Karang Taruna terkendala ketiadaan pengelola tetap bank sampah, sementara belum adanya prosedur operasional standar tertulis memicu imbalan tambahan informal saat volume sampah melonjak. Kebaruan studi ini membuktikan bahwa kelancaran operasional tidak serta-merta mencerminkan tata kelola kolaboratif yang matang. Implikasinya, penguatan tata kelola memerlukan penegasan standar pelayanan yang transparan dan pelembagaan partisipasi pemuda secara terstruktur.]]>
