Jasran Asya
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, DKI Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Risk Management in Hospital Expansion Projects Amid Regulatory Uncertainty: Manajemen Risiko Hukum dalam Proyek Ekspansi Rumah Sakit di Tengah Ketidakpastian Regulasi Jasran Asya; Yohanes Calvinus; Oei Fuk Jin
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i4.1590

Abstract

General Background: Healthcare infrastructure development involves complex legal, financial, and institutional requirements that demand systematic project management. Specific Background: Hospital expansion projects face changing regulations, contractual obligations, and compliance requirements that may generate disputes, delays, and cost overruns. Knowledge Gap: Previous research frequently separates legal considerations from project management, leaving integrated approaches to regulatory uncertainty insufficiently developed. Aims: This study identifies major legal risk categories and develops an integrated conceptual framework using a systematic literature review guided by PRISMA. Seventeen relevant studies were examined through thematic analysis and narrative synthesis. Results: Four interconnected dimensions emerged: contractual and public private partnership risks, governance and compliance risks, project governance risks, and legal risks associated with healthcare digital transformation. Regulatory uncertainty was identified as a concern for financing stability, institutional coordination, project performance, and dispute prevention. Novelty: The study proposes an interdisciplinary framework integrating regulatory uncertainty, legal risk, project governance, and project performance into a unified analytical structure specifically addressing hospital infrastructure development. Implications: The proposed framework provides a conceptual foundation for hospital administrators, investors, legal practitioners, and policymakers to formulate adaptive compliance strategies, strengthen contractual arrangements, and manage regulatory challenges. Highlights: Seventeen studies identified contractual, compliance, managerial, and digital exposures. Policy instability threatens financing stability and increases the potential for disputes. Fragmented disciplinary approaches demonstrate the need for an integrated conceptual framework. Keywords: Legal Risk Management, Hospital Expansion, Regulatory Uncertainty, Project Governance, Systematic Literature Review.
Legal Uncertainty and Claims Disputes Challenge Hospital Governance Under National Health Insurance: Ketidakpastian Hukum dan Sengketa Klaim Menjadi Tantangan bagi Tata Kelola Rumah Sakit di Bawah Sistem Asuransi Kesehatan Nasional Jasran Asya
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i4.1736

Abstract

General Background: National health insurance programs create complex legal relationships between healthcare providers and purchasing institutions, particularly regarding reimbursement and accountability. Specific Background: Private hospitals operating under Indonesia's National Health Insurance program face contractual and regulatory challenges, illustrated by two disputes involving RSIA Tiara and BPJS Kesehatan concerning retrospective claim deductions and cesarean section reimbursement audits. Knowledge Gap: Existing regulatory arrangements leave questions regarding contractual authority, administrative accountability, medical assessment standards, and dispute resolution procedures. Aims: This study examines hospital business challenges and formulates legal recommendations using normative juridical research supported by statutory, case, and conceptual approaches grounded in Wolfgang Friedmann's functional critical legal theory. Results: Five interconnected challenges were identified: asymmetric hybrid legal relationships, regulatory uncertainty, potential escalation of administrative disagreements into fraud allegations, inadequate dispute resolution mechanisms, and tensions between administrative and clinical assessments. Retrospective deductions and contemporary reimbursement audits require distinct legal evaluations. Novelty: The study applies Friedmann's functional legal perspective to distinguish contractual, regulatory, and clinical dimensions of hospital reimbursement disputes within a single analytical framework. Implications: Hospitals should strengthen contractual safeguards and clinical documentation, while regulators should establish transparent audit procedures, independent dispute resolution mechanisms, and appropriate clinical review standards to support legal certainty and institutional accountability. Highlights: Hybrid contractual arrangements create asymmetric authority between providers and purchasing institutions. Retrospective deductions and surgical reimbursement audits raise distinct questions of legality. Five interconnected challenges demonstrate the need for independent review and transparent procedures. Keywords: JKN, BPJS Kesehatan, Hospitals, Claim Disputes, Friedmann’s Legal Theory