Aldi Suandi
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Differences in Student Learning Outcomes Using the Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Instructional Model in Islamic Religious Education Classes at Junior High Schools Aldi Suandi; Mustapa Ahmad; Muhammad Bahruddin Yusuf
PAI RAFAH Vol 8 No 4 (2026): Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/pair.v8i4.19871

Abstract

The learning model in a learning process is very important in determining student learning outcomes. In observing the difference in results in aspects that are generally desired by all students, namely student learning outcomes, therefore the researcher uses the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model in the subject of Islamic Religious Education grade IX at SMP Negeri 1 Muaradua Kisam OKUS, this is the goal or makes this student learning outcome the direction of this research is held. The quantitative type of research is used in making and building this research. The implementation is by using true experimental research with a design of two classes, namely the experimental class which is the class that is given treatment and the control class, which is the class that is not given treatment. After various data sets are collected, then these data will be accumulated or calculated and summed to see the difference in student learning outcomes.The results showed that the results of classes that used the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model or experimental classes found a score with details of the high score category, namely 37.0%. medium 48.2%. low 14.8%. Meanwhile, the results of classes that did not use Think Talk Write (TTW) or the control class found a score with a high grade category details of 3.3%. medium 93.4%. and low 3.3%. There are many results of the T Test that show a tally greater than the table at both a significant level of 5% and a significant 1%, which is 7.631. Thus, H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, which shows that there is a difference in the learning outcomes of students who use the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model.