Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ancaman AI Terhadap Pencemaran Budaya Sosial Indonesia: Analisis Kritis, Eksplorasi Data, dan Mitigasi Berbasis Filosofi Kebangsaan Jennifer Alicia Santoso; Mifta Rio Vembrian; Rhenald Brian Sanjaya; Ayyin Anggraini; Jastian Bernard Su
Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jerumi.v3i2.7456

Abstract

Perkembangan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) menawarkan peluang transformatif namun juga menghadirkan ancaman signifikan terhadap budaya sosial Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis kritis terhadap potensi AI dalam mencemari nilai-nilai luhur dan identitas kebangsaan, didukung oleh eksplorasi data fenomena digital.
THE PARTIES' UNAWARENESS OF INCONSISTENT REGULATORY CHANGES IN CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS Imelda Martinelli; Ayyin Anggraini; Agresta Midianti Jumaedi
CARONG: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October-December, Education, Social Transformation, and Humanities in the Digit
Publisher : Universitas Serambi Mekkah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/z8e68417

Abstract

This study examines the Indonesian law of obligations under Book III of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) in comparison with the Dutch Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek (NBW), focusing on the binding force of contract, freedom of contract, and consensualism. In practice, contracts are often disrupted by default (wanprestasi), while scholars remain divided on whether Article 1266 of the KUHPerdata is mandatory law (dwingend recht) requiring judicial termination or supplementary law (aanvullend recht). This uncertainty encourages unilateral termination that may qualify as an unlawful act under Article 1365. Using a normative-empirical method, this study analyses the dispute between PT Mulia Realty Batindo and PT Batama Nusa Permai over the Bukit Palem Permai Project, decided in Decisions No. 15/Pdt.G/2022/PN Btm, No. 164/PDT/2022/PT PBR, and No. 975 K/Pdt/2023. The findings show that the Supreme Court majority accepted Batam Land Office Circular No. 246/640/VIII/2006 as a governmental act (fait du prince) excusing the developer from liability for default, supported by the parties' addendum, good faith, and public policy. No negligence existed when the contract was concluded in 2004; the real problem arose after 2006, when unilateral termination contradicted the jointly agreed addendum.