Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang
Redjeki Handayani
SD 1 Jati Kulon, Kudus
Education

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN MEDIA PASIFIK (PAPAN SAFARI HITUNG INTERAKTIF) PADA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS V SD 1 JATI KULON Amanda Nur Fadilah; Wawan Shokib Rondli; Redjeki Handayani
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 04 (2026): Volume 12 No. 04, Desember 2026 Published
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i04.19278

Abstract

Mathematics learning outcomes of fifth-grade students at SD 1 Jati Kulon were still low, mainly because lessons were teacher-centered and no concrete media was available to help students understand place value and operations on large whole numbers. This classroom action research aimed to improve teacher skills and students’ mathematics learning outcomes through the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model assisted by Pasifik (Papan Safari Hitung Interaktif), an interactive safari-themed counting board. The study followed the Kemmis and McTaggart spiral and was carried out in two cycles on the topic of whole numbers up to 100,000, with 35 fifth-grade students as subjects. Data were collected through written tests, teacher skill observation (10 indicators, scale 1–4), interviews with the classroom teacher, field notes, and documentation. Test results were analyzed descriptively and compared across cycles; qualitative data were analyzed with the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana. Teacher skills increased from 29 points (72.5%, Good) in Cycle I to 36 points (90%, Very Good) in Cycle II. The class mean rose from 51.27 to 81.01, and the number of students reaching the minimum mastery criterion (70) grew from 13 (37.14%) to 31 (88.57%). All 35 students improved their scores, although four students remained below the criterion. Both success indicators were therefore achieved by the end of Cycle II.
Co-Authors Amanda Nur Fadilah Wawan Shokib Rondli