Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik J SIG (Jurnal Sains Informasi Geografi) JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)
Novianto, Arif
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Energy Environmental Science Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Good or Bad Governance for Whom? Governance is a Trojan Horse for Capital Expansion in Pati, Indonesia Novianto, Arif
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.89148

Abstract

Governance as theory and practice, since the end of the 20th century, has been disseminated as the best form of public management. This notion of governance emphasizes reducing state actor authority, and in the name of participation, the voice of the state actor is positioned on par with the voices of private actors and civil society. To support the concept of governance, international organizations and financial institutions (United Nation, World Bank & IMF) promote the principles of "good governance" as the antithesis of "bad governance" which is characterized as corrupt, undemocratic and detrimental to the people. This research challenges governance theory and practice, with a case study of Indocement Ltd (Heidelberg Cement Group) expansion in Central Java, Indonesia. This research uses an ethnographic method, which was carried out in two periods, in 2014-2015 and 2017-2018. The contribution of this research is that instead of being happily accepted by the people, governance and the principles of good governance were actually opposed by the grassroots community in the case of Indocement Ltd's development plan in the Kendeng Mountains, Pati Regency, Central Java. This resistance was motivated by the use of governance and the principles of "good governance" to force the construction of a cement factory. In fighting against these problems, the people's movement advocated democracy from below through a counter-hegemonic movement that involved people, until finally it succeeded in thwarting a project to build a cement factory in their place. For people who reject the cement factory plan, governance is "good" for capital, but "bad" for the environment and people's livelihoods. 
Good or Bad Governance for Whom? Governance is a Trojan Horse for Capital Expansion in Pati, Indonesia Novianto, Arif
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 28, No 1 (2024): May 2024
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.89148

Abstract

Governance as theory and practice, since the end of the 20th century, has been disseminated as the best form of public management. This notion of governance emphasizes reducing state actor authority, and in the name of participation, the voice of the state actor is positioned on par with the voices of private actors and civil society. To support the concept of governance, international organizations and financial institutions (United Nation, World Bank & IMF) promote the principles of "good governance" as the antithesis of "bad governance" which is characterized as corrupt, undemocratic and detrimental to the people. This research challenges governance theory and practice, with a case study of Indocement Ltd (Heidelberg Cement Group) expansion in Central Java, Indonesia. This research uses an ethnographic method, which was carried out in two periods, in 2014-2015 and 2017-2018. The contribution of this research is that instead of being happily accepted by the people, governance and the principles of good governance were actually opposed by the grassroots community in the case of Indocement Ltd's development plan in the Kendeng Mountains, Pati Regency, Central Java. This resistance was motivated by the use of governance and the principles of "good governance" to force the construction of a cement factory. In fighting against these problems, the people's movement advocated democracy from below through a counter-hegemonic movement that involved people, until finally it succeeded in thwarting a project to build a cement factory in their place. For people who reject the cement factory plan, governance is "good" for capital, but "bad" for the environment and people's livelihoods. 
ANALISIS KUANTITAS AIR TANAH BEBAS MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN DEBIT DINAMIS DI KECAMATAN TEMON, KABUPATEN KULON PROGO, YOGYAKARTA Novianto, Arif; Sejati, Sadewa Purba
J SIG (Jurnal Sains Informasi Geografi) Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31314/jsig.v6i1.2385

Abstract

Groundwater in Temon District, Kulon Progo Regency, has the potential to experience pressure due to massive land use change. The quantity of groundwater in Temon District needs to be identified to determine the existing groundwater condition. The study was conducted to determine the amount of groundwater in the Temon District. The data used in the study include groundwater depth data, elevation data, groundwater level data, and data related to aquifer characteristics. Primary data were collected through field surveys. Secondary data are extracted through literature studies. Data analysis was carried out using the Darcy method. The results showed that the dynamic quantity of groundwater amounted to 4,996.3 m3/day. Factors affecting the active portion of groundwater include aquifer characteristics, groundwater depth, and groundwater hydraulic slope. Based on a comparison with the results of previous studies, it is known that there was a decrease in groundwater for five years (2016 to 2021) of 8,089,710 m3/year. The average reduction per year is 1,617,942 m3/year. Factors that influence the decrease in groundwater quantity are changes in land use and massive groundwater use.
Co-Authors Sejati, Sadewa Purba