Adi, Danang Wahyu Setyo
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pembatasan Hak Veto dalam DK-PBB Terkait Konflik Bersenjata di Suriah Adi, Danang Wahyu Setyo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): International Law Theme
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) is a new international order organization that was formed after the failure of the League of Nations (LON) after the world war. Within the United Nations, there are important organs, one of which is the Security Council with five permanent members including the United States, Britain, Russia, France, and China. The five permanent members have the authority to issue Veto rights over the policies to be determined. Including one of them is the policy to issue a resolution to cases of armed conflict in Syria. This paper will discuss in more depth the resolution policy in terms of sources of international law and related theories. Including, in this case, the author criticizes the conception of Veto rights attached to the five permanent member states of the UN Security Council which should be aimed at and used to achieve world peace and not for specific interests.
Pembatasan Hak Veto dalam DK-PBB Terkait Konflik Bersenjata di Suriah Adi, Danang Wahyu Setyo
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 1 No 9 (2020): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v1i9.222

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) is a new international order organization formed after the failure of the Post-World War League of Nations (LBB). Within the UN, there are important organs, one of which is the Security Council with five permanent members including the United States, Britain, Russia, France and China. The five permanent members have the authority to issue veto power over the policies to be established. One of them is the policy of issuing resolutions to the case of armed conflict in Syria. This paper will discuss in more depth the policy of the resolution in view of international legal sources and related theories. Included in this regard are the authors criticizing the conception of veto power attached to the five permanent member states of the UN Security Council which should be aimed and used to achieve world peace and not for any particular interest.