Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Fiqh and Usul
?????, ????
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
A Study on the Nature of Context from the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence and Usul al-Fiqh ????? ?????, ????; ?????, ???????; ?????, ????
??? ? ???? ???? 51 ????? 1: ????? ????? ??6? ???? ???8
Publisher : ???????? ??????? ?????? ????

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (302.828 KB) | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v51i1.55299

Abstract

Context, as the mental framework and format of speech and the place where evidences are realized, plays a role in understanding the intention of speech and is arranged in the form of either previous or future attached and connected verbal evidences. Detached evidences are considered as attached evidences if applied in the speech of a speaker like the divine lawgiver whose habit is to apply evidences separately and rely on them; hence, attachment in his words constitutes detachment. Textual evidence, due to its closeness and connection to the speech, is considered as attached evidence; even one may say the former is of the latter?s type or identical to it. The intention and termination of the speech, although helpful as an essential element in this regard, lack the necessary capacity to be included into the definition, since they fail to cover all instances of context conveyance including instances not intended by the speaker such as implicit conveyance. In addition, a definition of context which does not include previous verbal evidences or contextual evidences is a strict definition which is in contrast with its wide cases of application. On the other hand, consideration of detached evidences in all speeches even in the divine lawgiver's is an extended and defective definition of context.
Idjmā‘(Consensus) Caught up between Mohaghegh Ardabili’s Rejection and Approval ?????, ????; ?????, ????; ????? ????, ????
??? ? ???? ???? 51 ????? 2: ????? ????? ??7? ??????????8
Publisher : ???????? ??????? ?????? ????

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (631.026 KB) | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v51i2.60776

Abstract

????? ??? ?? ?????????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ??? ? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ???. ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??????? (? 993 ?) ???. ?? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???. ????? ???????????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ???????? ???? ? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ? ???????? ????? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ???.
Idjmā‘(Consensus) Caught up between Mohaghegh Ardabili’s Rejection and Approval ?????, ????; ?????, ????; ????? ????, ????
??? ? ???? ???? 51 ????? 2: ????? ????? ??7? ??????????8
Publisher : ???????? ??????? ?????? ????

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (631.026 KB) | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v51i2.60776

Abstract

????? ??? ?? ?????????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ??? ? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?? ?? ??? ????? ???. ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??????? (? 993 ?) ???. ?? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ???????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???. ????? ???????????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ???????? ???? ? ????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ? ???????? ????? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ???.
The Legal Addresses Theory; a New Horizon in Analyzing the Nature of Religious Ruling ??????, ????; ?????, ????
??? ? ???? ???? 51 ????? 2: ????? ????? ??7? ??????????8
Publisher : ???????? ??????? ?????? ????

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (474.289 KB) | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v51i1.62036

Abstract

?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ?????????. ????? ?????? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ????? ? ?????? ?? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ???? ???????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ? ????? ???? ????????. ?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ? ???? ??? ????? ? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ????? ??????.
THE STIPULATION OF “RETURN OF THE ENDOWMENT OBJECT TO THE DONOR’S PROPERTY IN CASE OF NEED” AS A RESOLUTORY CONDITION IN THE ENDOWMENT CONTRACT A JURISPRUDENTIAL AND LEGAL STUDY دوره51 شماره4 سال1398 ?????, ??? ????; ?????, ???? ???; ??????, ????; ?????, ????
??? ? ???? ???? 51 ????? 4: ????? ????? ??9? ?????????8
Publisher : ???????? ??????? ?????? ????

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (560.198 KB) | DOI: 10.22067/jfu.v51i4.65641

Abstract

Different opinions have been presented regarding the validity or invalidity of an endowment in which the donor incorporates a condition under which in case of need, the endowment object returns to his property. The opponents of validity of this act either consider it void ab initio or believe that such act is in fact a surrender of property not endowment; since in any situation, endowment must be perpetual and the condition that the object returns to the donor contradicts the essential character of endowment and is against the requirements of endowment contract. The third category consider the endowment and the condition as valid. The origin of all of the above said theories is the issue of ?requirement of perpetuity in endowment contract? and the possibility of incorporating a resolutory condition therein. The present research, after studying the current jurisprudential opinions in this connection and accepting the theory of non-requirement of perpetuity in endowment, has proven the correctness of ?the validity of endowment on condition that the endowment object returns to the donor's property in case of need? and by examining the concept of resolutory condition in law has considered it as applicable to the condition incorporated in endowment contract and the authors believe that based on the theory accepted in Islamic jurisprudence, it is permitted to incorporate a resolutory condition in the endowment contract and  the condition of return of the object to the donor in case of need is its most obvious instance.
Co-Authors ????? ????, ???? ????? ?????, ???? ?????, ??? ???? ?????, ???? ??? ?????, ??????? ??????, ????