Umar, Atho'illah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

BUDAYA KRITIK ULAMA HADIS PERSPEKTIF HISTORIS DAN PRAKTIS Umar, Atho'illah
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): DESEMBER
Publisher : Program Studi Perbandingan Agama, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.569 KB)

Abstract

Sunnah, as the second source after Koran had been through several hard priod which stems from slander, emerge in the midst of Muslims since the death of caliph Othman b. ?Affan. During that, the Sunnah of the Prophet become a tool for political infighting and it arose multi fanaticism, starting from the fanaticism of madhhab, race, class, and other fanaticism along with the break up of the Muslims into sects. This makes the Sunnah ainted. It was difficult to distinguish between an authentic hadith, da?îf even mawdû?. It is difficult to distinguish whether the transmitters are thiqah, free from fanaticism, or other tendency, which caused the narrators unable to maintain the integrity of Sunnah. Since the codification campaign echoed the hadith, the scholars began the unification and selection of traditions in various ways, all were concentrated on the activities of criticism as an effort to authenticate hadith, chains. So, the common question of tradition at the time was whether the isnâd valid, whether the matn certainly valid as well. This paradigm emerged different disciplines related to the study, such as science of isnâd, al-jarh wa al-ta?dîl, al-tabaqât, al-?ilal and so forth
Konsep Hadis Mukhtalif di Kalangan Ahli Fikih dan Ahli Hadis Umar, Atho'illah
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 2 No. 2 (2012): DESEMBER
Publisher : Department of Qur'an dan Hadith Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (653.548 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2012.2.2.274-293

Abstract

The scholars of hadith that every second sacrifice to serve their Sunnah is like the rain that never stopped watering the earth, like trees that never stop giving fruit. Anyone who wants to learn to understand the hadith with a good understanding, it should never leave them. It is ironic if we as students hadith the end is not yet in need of them, does not depend on them but rather learn hadith from thinkers who incidentally never glorify Sunnah especially koran. Among the Sunnah which is quite difficult to understand the Sunnah that among each other mentioned hadith contradict each other or mukhtalif. For the layman who does not have a strong faith would have negative thinking and may throw accusations to the Sunnah of the Prophet Muh}ammad as a speaker. Therefore, the scholars of hadith not remain silent in the face of many traditions who come to our mukhtalif. Scholars of hadith and then formulate the rules that are perfect to understand the h}adîth mukhtalif
Budaya Kritik Ulama Hadis Perspektif Historis dan Praktis Umar, Atho'illah
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): DESEMBER
Publisher : Department of Qur'an dan Hadith Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.569 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2011.1.2.193-216

Abstract

Sunnah, as the second source after Koran had been through several hard priod which stems from slander, emerge in the midst of Muslims since the death of caliph Othman b. ‘Affan. During that, the Sunnah of the Prophet become a tool for political infighting and it arose multi fanaticism, starting from the fanaticism of madhhab, race, class, and other fanaticism along with the break up of the Muslims into sects. This makes the Sunnah ainted. It was difficult to distinguish between an authentic hadith, da‘îf even mawdû‘. It is difficult to distinguish whether the transmitters are thiqah, free from fanaticism, or other tendency, which caused the narrators unable to maintain the integrity of Sunnah. Since the codification campaign echoed the hadith, the scholars began the unification and selection of traditions in various ways, all were concentrated on the activities of criticism as an effort to authenticate hadith, chains. So, the common question of tradition at the time was whether the isnâd valid, whether the matn certainly valid as well. This paradigm emerged different disciplines related to the study, such as science of isnâd, al-jarh wa al-ta‘dîl, al-tabaqât, al-‘ilal and so forth