Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir Al-Wardah: Jurnal Kajian Perempuan, Gender dan Agama International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy Mazalat: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Andi, Azhari
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
KEPEMIMPINAN PERSPEKTIF ALQURAN; INTERPRETASI SEMIOTIK QS. AL-BAQARAH (2): 30-34 Andi, Azhari
At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Volume 4 No. 1, Juni 2019
Publisher : Department of Alquran Science and Interpretation of the Faculty of Ushuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah of IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/tibyan.v4i1.883

Abstract

Discourse of leadership is always facual and actual to be discussed. It is increasingly discussed by Indonesian in which general elction is coming up this year. This article attempts to examine discourse of leadership on QS. Al-Baqarah 2 / 30-34 which is analyzed through semiotic perspective that is introduced by Charles Sander Pierce. The article finds that requirement of being khalifah which is discussed by Q. 2/31-34 is having knowledge. Besides, spiritual piety is needed to become khalifah but not as significant as having knowladge.  In the other hand, the Qur'an, by Q. 2/31-34, criticizes that to become a leader is not depending on lineage factors and spiritual piety (only).
Implikasi Teori Batas Terhadap Penafsiran Ayat Poligami QS. An-Nisa Ayat 3 Arpaja, Habib; Andi, Azhari
AL-WARDAH: Jurnal Kajian Perempuan, Gender dan Agama Vol 17, No 1 (2023): Edisi Juni
Publisher : IAIN TERNATE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46339/al-wardah.v17i1.1048

Abstract

Diskursus poligami merupakan isu menarik sejak dahulu hingga sekarang. Berbagai penafsiran menjelaskan isu poligami justru menuai banyak polemik, mulai tafsir klasik, feminisme hingga tafsir kontekstual. Artikel ini berusaha memberikan penafsiran terhadap ayat poligami (QS. An-Nisa: 3) dengan pendekatan hermeneutika Muhammad Syharur atau Limit Theory. Maka penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif (library research) dengan pendekatan Teori Batas, merupakan salah satu pendekatan dalam ijtihad, dengan mempelajari ayat-ayat al-Qur’an, khususnya berkaitan dengan ayat-ayat hukum. Artikel ini memperlihatkan bahwa berdasarkan Q.4/3, Muhammad Syahrur merekontruksi konsep praktik poligami dengan menggunakan analisis linguistik dan teori hudud menjadi fokus metodologinya. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa praktek poligami menurut Syahrur bisa dilakukan dengan ketentuan dua batasan, yaitu batasan kuantitatif dan batasan kualitatif. Kedua batasan tersebut harus diterapkan secara bersamaan. Pemahaman umum poligami dari segi batasan kuantitatif adalah bahwa seseorang menikahi minimal satu wanita tanpa ada persyaratan janda atau perawan, dan batas maksimal adalah empat wanita. Pemahaman poligami dalam teori batas dari segi batasan kualitatif dan kuantitatif adalah bahwa seorang menikahi satu perempuan sebagai batas minimal dengan tanpa adanya persyaratan apakah janda atau perawan. Menikahi 2 atau 3 orang perempuan adalah termasuk dalam wilayah ijtihad dengan persyaratan harus memiliki anak yatim. Batas maksimal adalah empat orang wanita dengan persyaratan janda yang memiliki anak yatim.
THE QUR'ANIC SEMANTIC LANDSCAPE OF ȘALĀH: EVOLUTION AND INTERPRETATION Andi, Azhari
Mazalat: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Mazalat: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam STISA Ash-Shofa Tasikmalaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64367/m-jpi.v5i2.11

Abstract

This article aims to examine the term șalāh in the Qur'an. While most Muslims understand șalāh as a ritual that begins with takbir and ends with salam, this perspective limits the comprehensive meaning of șalāh. The Qur'an, however, employs the term in various contexts and with multiple nuances. This study adopts the semantic framework of Toshihiko Izutsu to explore and analyze these different uses. The findings reveal that in the Qur'an, șalāh encompasses a range of meanings beyond obligatory prayers, including recitation of the Qur'an, supplication, mercy, blessings, and places of worship. The semantic evolution of șalāh spans from pre-Qur'anic times to the post-Qur'anic era. In the pre-Qur'anic period, șalāh generally referred to prayers with worldly connotations and expressions of respect for rulers. During the Qur'anic period, the meaning of șalāh shifted towards spiritual and eschatological dimensions. In the post-Qur'anic era, particularly within fiqh literature, the term has been narrowly interpreted as obligatory prayers and related ritual acts. This study highlights the dynamic nature of șalāh’s semantic development and its broader implications within Islamic thought.
Before Orthodoxy; The Story of Abraham's Sacrifice (Dzabīh) in Early Muslim Commentaries Andi, Azhari; Ahmad, Hamdi Putra
International Journal of Islamic Khazanah Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): IJIK
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijik.v14i1.29413

Abstract

The story of Abraham's sacrifice holds significant place in Islam, and what Muslims believe about Ishmael as the intended sacrifice is not the only belief in the Muslim tradition. This paper examines the historical transformation of Abraham’s sacrifice narratives in Muslim commentaries (tafsīrs), with a focus on revealing how, when, why, and at whose hands this transformation occurred. Employing the theory of tafsir as a genealogical tradition of Walid A. Saleh and adopting a socio-historical approach, this paper investigates the evolution of the interpretation of the story of dzabīh from Isaac to Ismael and the factors contributing to this evolution. The analysis reveals that in the first four centuries of Islam, Muslim interpretations and attitudes regarding the story of dzabīh were the complete opposite of what is common today. Muslim commentators, such as al-Suddī, Ibn Juraij, Muqatil ibn Sulaiman, al-Thabarī, and al-Samarqandī, firmly believed that Isaac is dzabīh. However, Ibn Athiyyah and al-Baghawī, the commentators of the sixth century hijri, showed different responses towards this story, neutral and favoring Ismael as dzabīh. Additionally, in the eighth century Hijri, Ishmael as dzabīh gained orthodoxy and popularity, as demonstrated by Ibn Taimiyyah and Ibn Kathir. They condemned the pro-Isaac as heretical interpretation and rejected it. Even though they disagree with the proIsaac commentators, they still quoted the narrations and opinions of previous commentators by providing counter-arguments, and this is what is called tafsir as a genealogical tradition. Furthermore, power dynamics and the socio-political setting of the eighth century may have had an impact on this change in the story of dzabīh. This evolution highlights the dynamic nature of Islamic interpretation, where interpretation is not necessarily static but evolves over time, shaped by historical contingencies and socio-political dynamics. This historical reevaluation illuminates the complexity of Islamic intellectual history and the fluidity of religious interpretation in the Muslim tradition.
VOICING LIBERATION OF WOMEN: QASIM AMIN AND ASMA BARLAS Andi, Azhari
Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/ajipp.v5i1.9172

Abstract

Does Islam advocate inequality? This question has been a concern of Muslim scholars in recent centuries, notably Qasim Amin and Asma Barlas. Hence, this paper aims to make a comparative study of Amin and Barlas’s thoughts on the liberation of women. The data will be analyzed through a descriptive-analytic approach. The analysis finds that Amin and Barlas have similarities and differences in voicing women's freedom. They criticize and reconstruct some concepts considered established within the Islamic tradition, such as hijāb and polygamy. They firmly oppose the established idea of hijab, which means covering women's entire bodies except for their eyes, which is contrary to Islamic teaching. They disagree, however, on which a hijab should cover parts of a woman's body. Furthermore, Amin broadens the definition of hijāb, which restricts women's movements (qasr al-mar’ah fī al-bait). In terms of polygamy, however, they critically assessed the classical understanding of the permissibility of polygamy. Therefore, they impose strict conditions on the permissibility of polygamy. Nevertheless, Amin seems to advocate that polygamy is not permissible. Amin and Barlas were inspired to reform Muslim society, specifically women's liberation, by their social context and experiences. Despite their good intentions, their ideas have received both criticism and praise. This mixed reception emphasizes the continuous struggle in the Muslim world about gender, tradition, and modernization.
Co-Authors Ahmad, Hamdi Putra Arpaja, Habib