Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Criminal Sanctions As an Eradication Strategy Of Corruption: A Critical Study from the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law Darudin, Mohammad
Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : IAIN Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.664 KB) | DOI: 10.22515/al-ahkam.v3i1.1345

Abstract

The spirit of anti-corruption movement  has been a motion since reformation era in 1998 and the government has issued various policies. Firstly, the policy relating to the substance of the law, the government has passed various laws and ratified international conventions. Secondly, the regulations concerning law enforcement agencies, the government has established the Corruption Eradication Commission, Corruption Crime Court, the Center for Reporting and Analyzing Financial Transactions (PPATK), the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), and the establishment of internal supervisory bodies. However,  these efforts seemingly  face failure. The facts show that corruption increases in the executive, legislative and judicial institutions, from the center to the region level. The failure of corruption eradication can be one of the reasons that indicates the formulation of criminal sanctions in Law No. 20/2001 for corruption is weak, not appropriate for the negative impacts of the crime. Consequently, the punishment imposed has no deterrent effect for either the perpetrators or others. It is contrast to the concept of sanctions in Islamic criminal law, sanctions imposed on the perpetrators must be comparable with their evil deeds (Qur'an Surah 42, verse 40), with the aim to benefit for human both individual and collective. According to the  concept, this article will examine criminal sanctions based on Islamic criminal law as an eradication strategy of corruption. The results of this article can be a consideration for the  revision of the framework in formulating criminal sanctions contained in Law No. 20 / 20011 concerning corruption.
Telaah Kritis Prinsip Prinsip Dasar Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Negara dan Musyawarah Darudin, Mohammad
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 21 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkutei.v21i2.24986

Abstract

Dalam pespektif Hukum Islam, pemilihan kepala negara merupakan kepentingan bersama dalam kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Terpilihnya kepala negara yang kredibel, ligitimid dalam sistem pemilihan yang demokratis berpegang teguh pada prinsip prinsip dasar musyawarah dalam majlis syura merupakan suatu keniscayaan atas terbentuknya walfare state/negara sejahtera/masyarakat madani. Sejarah telah membuktikan bahwa penerapan prinsip-prinpdasar musyawarah dalam pemilihan kepala negara yang bersumberkan nilai nilai dalam al-Quran dan hadis mampu melahirkan seorang kepala negara yang kredibel, ligitimed sebagaimana telah terjaddi pada masa kepemimpinan Nabi Muhammad dalam membangun kota Madinah dengan Piagam Madinah Nabi muhammad berhasil mempersatukan 13 komunitas yang bertikai dan mampu meningkatkan kesejahteraan rakyatnya. Keberhasilan ini kemudian dilanjutkan pada masa kepemimpinan khulafaurrasyidin, sahabat seniornya Abu Bakar, Umar, Usman dan Ali bin Abu Thalib. Keberhasilan ini sebagai konsekuensi logis dari penerapan prinsip-prinsip dasar musyawarah dalam majlis syura dalam menyelesaikan berbagai persoalan kehidupan sosial, ekonomi, budaya dan hukum serta dalam menyelesaikan persoalan pemilihan kepala negara.