Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Halim, Yoefanca

Universitas Tarumanagara

Author-ID : 1228105

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan dan PKPU Tirayo, Adriel Michael; Halim, Yoefanca
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

A legal product is expected to realize 3 legal purposes, which is Justice, Expediency and Legal Certainty. The definition of bankrupt assets is not mentioned implicitly in the Bankruptcy Law, that can lead to multiple interpretations. In practice, it happened in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst for the bankruptcy of PT. Tripanca Group, due to the absence of clear provisions relationg to bankruptcy assets. In this case, the problem to be answered is how is the implementation of bankrupt assets definitions in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst and the efforts that can be made related to the implementation of bankrupt assets definitions. This research used normative juridical method through literature study, then the data has been analized qualitatively and conclusions are drawn inductively. The results showed that the definition of "bankruptcy assets" in practice led to multiple interpretations as contained in the court judgement Number 33/Pailit/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, where the judge also included assets that did not belong to the debtor (third party collateral) into assets bankruptcy as a guarantee of repayment of debt. Therefore, efforts that can be made by the government are to revise the Bankruptcy Law, specifically related to the definition of Bankruptcy Assets to provide Legal Certainty and to disseminate information to legal entities, non-legal entities, and the public so as to gain understanding and knowledge related to Bankruptcy and PKPU in particular about bankruptcy assets.

Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan yang Belum Inkracht sebagai Novum dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Salim, Hardy; Halim, Yoefanca; Tirayo, Adriel Michael
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

A judicial institution has criteria that must be met, namely principles that are open, corrective, and recordive. The broadest opportunity to submit corrections and recordings of decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht) deemed unfair by justice seekers can be done through a Judicial Review. However, the Judicial Review is very limitative, one of them with the requirement for novum. But the regulation of conditions can be said to be a condition as a novum not strictly regulated. By looking at this matter, the research is carried out with the aim of finding out the validity of court decisions which have not been inkracht as novum in the submission for reconsideration. This study is using a normative research method. In conclusion, court decisions that have not been inkracht as novum in submitting judicial review are valid because they need to prioritize the value of justice and truth before legal certainty. As long as the prerequisites in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code have been fulfilled, and one of the requirements in paragraph (2) has been fulfilled.

Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan dengan Minuta Akta Halim, Yoefanca; Sudewo, Fricky; Fidelia, Tyas
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Notary as a general official has authorization in making an authentic deed and have other powers as referred to in this law or under other laws, as described in the Department of Law Notary. In carrying out his position, a notary is obliged to act as a trustee, honest, equitable, independent, immutated, and keep the interests of the parties and to make the deed Minuta. In addition, a notary is obliged to issue the Grosse deed, copy of the deed, or Deed citation based on Minuta deed, such matters are governed by Law No.2 of 2014 as has been amended by Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of notary. It means that a notary is supposed to carry out obligations. But in fact, the notary can still be found that does not carry out obligations as stipulated in the notary law. By looking at this raises an issue about, "What is Notary's responsibility for the inconsistency of the Copy act with the Minuta deed?". In general, the responsibilities of notary public can be examined in the public, criminal, notary LAW, and responsibility for performing the duties of the department under the notary Code of Ethics. Civil liability regarding material truth in the deed made and can be categorized as making false documents in criminal terms. While the responsibilities according to the LAW and the Code of Ethics Department notary, notary may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral warning, letters, temporary stops, and stops with respect or disrespect.

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search