Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Research Review Quarterly Khatulistiwa Law Review
Simatupang, Jonasmer
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Influence of Money Political Culture in Elections on the Sustainability of Indonesian Democracy Simatupang, Jonasmer; Subekhan, Muhammad
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 4 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (November 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Betwe
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i03.27028

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is motivated by the rise of money politics that occurs in almost every corner of the regions in Indonesia. Democracy is a system that is built where the people are given the absolute right to be given politically who is given the power to govern through the election process. The political dynamics can be seen through the democratic party in Indonesia. One of the challenges in the democratic party, through elections is the practice of money politics. Money politics takes place at every level of elections in Indonesia, which starts from the central level to the lowest level, namely the village. Money politics or money politics is an illegal practice in elections that can influence election participants with the lure of certain rewards and seems to have strong legitimacy from the people. People who have registered to participate in the election whether they participate in voting, or abstentions and vote because of money politics. This negative phenomenon arises in Indonesia's democratic transition. The process of money politics occurs due to the lack of regular supervision and outreach from the Election Supervisory Body, so that the elites or timses of political parties are free to do "generosity" when the day of D or before the election is held. In this regard, elections play a central role in Indonesia's democratic system. In several analyzes and studies, the Indonesian people still consider "reasonable" money politics conducted by election participants.
Legal Analysis of the Mass Corruption Phenomenon of Board Members and Criminal Liability Simatupang, Jonasmer
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 5 No 1 (2019): L. Research Rev. Q. (February 2019) "Challenges & Strengthening Scientific-Based
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v5i01.29705

Abstract

The Republic of Indonesia unitary state ia a legal state based on the constitution. In a country that adheres to democracy, the law become the supreme commander in a effort to eradicate criminal cases and included acts of corruption corruption crime in Indonesia is a social issues that has never been exhausted to be discussed, in the world of law, this has been included in the category of extradionary crime because is not only harms the state, but the practice also violates the social and economic rights of the community a large so that eradication action must also be carried out with extradionary legal force. A pattern or phenomena of bulk corruption is recently revealed by the people’s deputy officials. Almost the world room of the representative of the people of good people at the local people until the center was ever searched and representative of the people were brought to committing corruption in a way of like a budget, received a bribe and so forth. The practice has occured in the area of North Sumatera and city Malang. Various of these cases made the reputation of the people’s institutions deterioting among the people. Through this writing by analizing and investigating more deeply technical and systematic practice of the board members in the distorting the budget.
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI PEMBENTUKAN KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI: Menghapus Kebijakan Amnesti dan Mendesain Abolisi Ilyasa, Raden Muhammad Arvy; Raashad, Farrel Rivishah; Simatupang, Jonasmer
Khatulistiwa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Khatulistiwa Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/klr.v1i2.102

Abstract

Abstrak Maraknya kasus pelanggaran HAM berat pada masa lampau belum ditunjang dengan proses penyelesaian yang jelas yang berorientasi pada kebutuhan korban dan keluarganya. Penyelesaian melalui jalur KKR menjadi sangat urgen dilakukan. Namun, dalam perjalanannya UU KKR justru inkonstitusional sehingga pengungkapan kebenaran tidak dapat dilakukan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menelaah problematika dalam formulasi RUU KKR serta menelaah desain KKR dengan menghapus keberadaan amnesti. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa UU KKR melahirkan diskriminasi, memposisikan korban dan pelaku secara tidak seimbang, dan keberadaan amnesti dalam UU KKR menjadi pintu melanggengkan impunitas sehingga jalan terbaik yang dapat dilakukan adalah melakukan rekonstruksi dengan penguatan kedudukan korban, hak atas pemulihan secara imperatif, dan mengganti pengaturan amnesti dengan mendesain abolisi. Abolisi dirasakan jauh lebih tepat disbandingkan dengan amnesti yang menghapus segala ketentuan pidana bagi para pelaku. Abstract The rise of cases of gross human rights violations of the past has not been supported by a clear resolution process that is oriented towards the needs of victims and their families. The settlement of the TRC is very urgent. But, in its progress, the TRC Law is unconstitutional so that truth- telling cannot be done. The purpose of this research is to examine the problems in the formulation of the KKR Bill and to examine the KKR design by eliminating the existence of amnesty. The method used is library research with a normative approach. The results of the research reveal that the TRC Law creates discrimination, positions victims and perpetrators, and the existence of amnesty in the KKR Law becomes the door to perpetuate impunity so that the best way to do this is to carry out reconstruction by strengthening the position of victims, the right to recovery, and changing regulations. amnesty by designing abolition. Abolition is felt to be much more appropriate than amnesty which eliminates all criminal provisions for the perpetrators.
Co-Authors Ilyasa, Raden Muhammad Arvy Raashad, Farrel Rivishah Subekhan, Muhammad