Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal At-Tafkir Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Nairazi, Nairazi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN QANUN ACEH NO. 8 TAHUN 2015 MENURUT PERSPEKTIF PRAKTISI HUKUM KOTA LANGSA Nairazi, Nairazi
At-Tafkir Vol 11 No 2 (2018): Vol. 11 No 2 desember 2018
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/at.v11i2.734

Abstract

Mekanisme penerapan Qanun Aceh No. 8 Tahun 2015 bagi pelaku murtad tertuang di dalam Pasal 18 dan 19 adalah: setiap orang yang dengan sengaja mengeluarkan pernyataan atau perbuatan keluar dari Islam maka ia diberikan hukuman berupa cambuk atau penjara atau denda. Begitu juga ia akan diberikan uqubat pembinaan agar ia kembali memeluk agama Islam. Secara hierarki hukum pelaku murtad yang ada di dalam Qanun No. 8 Tahun 2015 akan menyalahi ketentuan HAM baik HAM internasional maupun peraturan perundang-undangan negara terutama UUD 1945, akan tetapi jika sanksi yang diberikan kepada pelaku murtad berupa sanksi adat maka ia tidak akan bertentangan dengan HAM, dikarenakan Aceh merupakan mayoritas masyarakat beragama Islam. Dan untuk HAM sendiri, baik internasional maupun nasional bisa membatasi kebebasan beragama selama hal tersebut menyangkut keamanan dan perdamaian di dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Untuk pengimplementasi pelaku murtad yang terdapat di dalam Qanun Aceh No. 8 Tahun 2015 belumlah jelas terutama mengenai hukum acaranya dan kewenangan lembaga yang mengadili kasus murtad dalam Qanun Aceh tersebut.
Fiqh dan Negara: Dinamika Penerapan Sanksi Hukuman Zina di Aceh Nairazi, Nairazi; Akmal, Akmal; Ferizal, Indis; Manoppo, Feni Riana
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v9i1.8929

Abstract

The formalization of Islamic criminal law in Aceh until now is still reaping debates, one of the debates that arises regarding the proposed stoning penalty for adultery offenders. The debate arises because the Qanun Jinayat that regulates adultery is not like what is regulated in Islamic law. This led to various arguments that the qanun was made not serious and full of ruling interests. This research departs from the important question of why the specific legal sanctions for adultery offenders in Qanun Jinayat do not differentiate between muhsan and ghairu muhsan adulterers. Doctrinal method is used in this research to see the legal aspects of adultery regulated in Qanun Jinayat, the approach used is legislation and legal politics. This paper argues that the application of stoning law for muhsan adulterers can be enforced depending on the government agreement. When viewed from a legal aspect, stoning punishment cannot be applied in Aceh, because Aceh is part of the Indonesian government which has legal norms and values in law enforcement. Stoning is a form of death penalty that involves pain for the perpetrator which is considered by human rights as torture. In the Indonesian criminal law context, the death penalty is a severe criminal legal sanction that can be applied to the perpetrator if his actions are classified as serious crimes. In Islam, the death penalty can be applied to those who take the lives of others. This shows that legally and politically, stoning is difficult to enforce in Aceh. However, stoning punishment can be enforced by being equated to castration punishment as a form of law enforcement or exiled in a remote place as a form of providing a deterrent effect for the perpetrator.
Fiqh dan Negara: Dinamika Penerapan Sanksi Hukuman Zina di Aceh Nairazi, Nairazi; Akmal, Akmal; Ferizal, Indis; Manoppo, Feni Riana
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v9i1.8929

Abstract

The formalization of Islamic criminal law in Aceh until now is still reaping debates, one of the debates that arises regarding the proposed stoning penalty for adultery offenders. The debate arises because the Qanun Jinayat that regulates adultery is not like what is regulated in Islamic law. This led to various arguments that the qanun was made not serious and full of ruling interests. This research departs from the important question of why the specific legal sanctions for adultery offenders in Qanun Jinayat do not differentiate between muhsan and ghairu muhsan adulterers. Doctrinal method is used in this research to see the legal aspects of adultery regulated in Qanun Jinayat, the approach used is legislation and legal politics. This paper argues that the application of stoning law for muhsan adulterers can be enforced depending on the government agreement. When viewed from a legal aspect, stoning punishment cannot be applied in Aceh, because Aceh is part of the Indonesian government which has legal norms and values in law enforcement. Stoning is a form of death penalty that involves pain for the perpetrator which is considered by human rights as torture. In the Indonesian criminal law context, the death penalty is a severe criminal legal sanction that can be applied to the perpetrator if his actions are classified as serious crimes. In Islam, the death penalty can be applied to those who take the lives of others. This shows that legally and politically, stoning is difficult to enforce in Aceh. However, stoning punishment can be enforced by being equated to castration punishment as a form of law enforcement or exiled in a remote place as a form of providing a deterrent effect for the perpetrator.
Co-Authors Akmal Akmal Ferizal, Indis Manoppo, Feni Riana