Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Mulianah, Mulianah
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
INTEGRASI KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS BERBASIS NILAI-NILAI ISLAM DAN BUDAYA BALLA LOMPOA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN KONSEP KESEIMBANGAN BANGUN DATAR: Model Pembelajaran Integratif antara Nilai, Budaya, dan Komunikasi Matematis Mulianah, Mulianah; Suradi, Suradi; Rosidah, Rosidah
Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7194

Abstract

Studi ini menelaah integrasi komunikasi matematis berbasis nilai Islam dan budaya Balla Lompoa dalam pembelajaran konsep keseimbangan bangun datar di SMP. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi matematis berfungsi sebagai sarana internalisasi nilai mizan, adl, dan ihsan melalui konteks etnomatematika Islami. Simbol keseimbangan dan simetri pada arsitektur Balla Lompoa dimanfaatkan sebagai media kontekstual untuk memahami konsep geometri secara bermakna. Integrasi nilai spiritual, logika matematis, dan kearifan lokal ini menghasilkan pembelajaran yang reflektif, kontekstual, serta berorientasi pada pembentukan karakter dan spiritualitas ilmiah.
Analisis Kognitif Siswa Berdasarkan Kerangka Formulate Employ Interpret pada Soal PISA Level 4 Khotimah, Husnul; Mulianah, Mulianah; Rahman, Abdul; Bernard, Bernard
Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Edisi Maret
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jm.v8i1.11101

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ difficulties in solving PISA Level 4 equivalent mathematical literacy tasks based on the Formulate, Employ, and Interpret (FEI) processes and to identify scaffolding implications at each stage. A descriptive design with quantitative and qualitative approaches was employed involving 28 ninth-grade junior high school students who worked on four PISA Level 4 equivalent tasks. Quantitative analysis was used to map students’ achievement profiles across the FEI processes, while qualitative analysis examined selected students’ written solution traces. The results indicate that students’ difficulties were most prominent at the formulate stage, as reflected in incomplete mathematical representations, although some students were able to carry out procedures (employ) and obtain correct final answers. Procedural errors and conceptual misconceptions persisted at the employ stage, whereas at the interpret stage students tended to stop at numerical results without adequately relating them to the problem context. These findings suggest that the FEI processes are interconnected and conceptually hierarchical, although they are not always explicitly articulated in students’ written responses, and provide a basis for future action-oriented research aimed at improving instruction and students’ performance in PISA assessments.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahman Bernard Bernard, Bernard Husnul Khotimah Rosidah Rosidah Suradi Suradi