Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Prophetic Law Review
Redhani, Muhammad Erfa
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Science and Prophetic Law: Karl Popper's Falsification Principle and Three Worlds of Science Redhani, Muhammad Erfa
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol6.iss1.art5

Abstract

Kuntowijoyo has significantly influenced scholars in Indonesia, particularly in the realm of legal studies, through his concept of prophetic social science. This concept gave rise to Prophetic Law, a legal ideology that seeks to address societal issues by grounding legal principles in transcendental values. Prophetic Law emerges not just as a theoretical framework but as a practical ideology aimed at reforming and advancing legal science to solve contemporary problems. However, for Prophetic Law to be recognized as a valid and robust field of science, it must withstand rigorous testing, particularly through the process of falsification, as proposed by Karl Popper.  This study aims to explore two critical aspects: first, the applicability of Popper's falsification theory to Prophetic Law, and second, the positioning and significance of Prophetic Law within Popper's three worlds of science. To investigate these aspects, a conceptual approach is employed, linking the principles of Prophetic Law with Popper's theories and delving into the philosophy of science to offer a comprehensive analysis. The study concludes that Popper's falsification principle is indeed relevant and necessary for testing the validity of Prophetic Law. Furthermore, in the context of Popper's three worlds of science, Prophetic Law currently resides in the second world, which is characterized by subjective ideas or what Popper refers to as "people's work." For Prophetic Law to evolve and become a universally accepted and applied legal framework, it must transition from the second world to the third world, where knowledge is objective and accessible to society at large.
Penafsiran Pembatasan Hak Dipilih bagi Pejabat Negara: Mengkaji Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nope, Bill; Redhani, Muhammad Erfa; Huda, Ni’matul; Hattabou, Anas
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 1: JANUARI 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss1.art8

Abstract

The political right to be elected within the Indonesian constitutional practice in the aftermath of the Constitutional Court decision has led to a shifted paradigm. This article seeks to answer two questions, namely: First, why is there a shift of paradigm related to the right to be elected in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU-XX/2022, especially regarding state officials who are not obliged to resign from their positions when they opt to become presidential and/or vice presidential candidates? Second, what is the legal impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 68/PUU-XX/2022 on state officials whom previously were required to resign by law? This article is the result of a doctrinal legal research that uses a case study approach, by examining the Constitutional Court decisions as the primary material. The study of the Constitutional Court's decision was carried out to analyse the considerations of the Constitutional Court justices ( ratio decidendi ) in issuing the said decision. This article concludes that: First, there has indeed been a shift of paradigm shift in the Constitutional Court by relaxing the restrictions on the right to be elected for state officials . The Constitutional Court views that in today's constitutional developments, it is no longer relevant to distinguish between the requirements for resignation for both elected and appointed officials. The Constitutional Court readjusts the right to be elected on the grounds that qualified human resources are needed to fill certain political positions and the right to be elected cannot be reduced due to the aforementioned circumstance in order to mitigate the risk of posing a form of discrimination. The legal impact that arose in the aftermath of the Constitutional Court's decision leads to a difference in treatment for a number of state officials/other public officials, namely that there remains a requirement to resign should they wanted to participate in political contests.Keywords: Right to be Elected, State Officials, Restrictions AbstrakHak untuk dipilih dalam praktik ketatanegaraan Indonesia, pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi telah mengalami pergeseran paradigma. Artikel ini ingin menjawab dua pertanyaan yaitu: Pertama, mengapa terjadi perubahan paradigma berkaitan dengan hak dipilih dalam Putusan MK Nomor 68/PUU-XX/2022 khususnya mengenai pejabat negara yang tidak harus mundur dari jabatannya saat menjadi calon Presiden dan calon Wakil Presiden? Kedua, Apa dampak hukum dari Putusan MK Nomor 68/PUU-XX/2022 tarhadap pejabat negara yang diharuskan mundur oleh undang-undang? Artikel ini merupakan hasil riset hukum doktrinal menggunakan pendekatan kasus yaitu dengan mengkaji  putusan-putusan MK sebagai bahan utama. Pengkajian terhadap putusan MK tersebut dilakukan untuk menganalisis berkaitan dengan pertimbangan hakim MK (ratio decidendi) dalam mengeluarkan putusan. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa: Pertama, telah terjadi perubahan paradigma MK dengan memperlonggar pembatasan hak untuk dipilih bagi pejabat negara atau pejabat publik. MK memandang bahwa dalam perkembangan ketatanegaraan hari ini sudah tidak relevan untuk membedakan syarat-syarat mengundurkan diri baik pejabat yang dipilih maupun pejabat yang diangkat. MK memperlonggar hak dipilih tersebut dengan alasan bahwa diperlukan SDM yang berkualitas untuk mengisi jabatan-jabatan politik dan menurut MK hak untuk dipilih tidak dapat dikurangi karena jika hal tersebut dilakukan merupakan bentuk diskriminasi. Dampak hukum yang timbul pasca putusan MK tersebut yaitu terdapat perbedaan perlakuan bagi sejumlah pejabat negara/pejabat publik lain yaitu masih adanya syarat mengundurkan diri jika ingin mengikuti konstestasi politik.Kata Kunci: Hak Dipilih, Pejabat Negara, Pembatasan
Co-Authors Hattabou, Anas Huda, Ni’matul Nope, Bill