This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta
Sitoresmi, Anggit Sinar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Pandecta

Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dan Akibat Hukum terhadap PT. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Irwanti, Kartika; Sitoresmi, Anggit Sinar
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.16902

Abstract

Menghindari terjadinya putusan kepailitan oleh pengadilan dengan suatu putusan hakim yang berkekuatan hukum tetap, maka akan dilakukan suatu upaya hukum yang dapat menyeimbangi keberadaan dan fungsi kepailitan itu sendiri, yaitu dengan dilakukannya Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).  Debitor yang tidak dapat  melanjutkan membayar utang-utangnya yang sudah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih, dapat mengajukan permohonan  PKPU dengan maksud untuk mengajukan rencana pembayaran utang    yang selanjutnya mengajukan rencana perdamaian yang meliputi tawaran pembayaran seluruhnya atau sebagian utang kepada para kreditor. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif,  pendekatan yang digunakan di dalam penelitian hukum adalah pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), dan pedekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil dan Pembahasan adalah PKPU yang diajukan oleh Pemohon PKPU dikabulkan dan telah berada dalam PKPU Sementara selama 45 hari, dan rencana perdamaian dan PKPU Tetap disetujui oleh kreditor maka pengadilan niaga menetapkan PKPU Tetap selama 30 hari. Rencana perdamaian disetujui akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan adalah mengesahkan perjanjian perdamaian dan PKPU demi hukum berakhir dan debitor atau pemohon PKPU untuk membayar biaya perkara sebesar Rp 1.427.000 (satu juta empat ratus dua puluh tujuh ribu rupiah).Prevent the incidence of bankruptcy decisions by a court of a judicial decisions to be fixed set of laws , it will be done a legal remedy that can be menyeimbangi the availability and function of bankruptcy it self , namely by doing suspension of debt payment obligation (PKPU). In which cannot estimate that he did not be able to continue their pay its debts they fall time and can charged , any PKPU with a view to propose plans payment of a debt with a view to propose plans peace which includes bid payment wholly or in part debt to creditors. Research methods that were used of these tests are research methodology of juridical law normative , the approach that was used with our research law is the statute approach , and  case approach  .The results and of discussion to be addressed is pkpu that had been requested by the applicant for pkpu granted to you has been in pkpu in it 45 the day , and the plan of just and peaceful society and that it should remain consistent pkpu firm assets as agreed on by a creditor so the commercial court shall at reach an agreement on fixing pkpu a perpetual 30 the day .The home grown peace plan accepted by the bank if as a result of law that were brought about is legalize the peace agreement and pkpu for the sake of law had ended and debitor or an applicant pkpu to pay the legal costs as much as Rp 1.427.000 ( one million four hundred twenty seven rupiah thousands to ) .
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan yang Dilakukan oleh Penyidik Sitoresmi, Anggit Sinar
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 14, No 2 (2019): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v14i2.17212

Abstract

Crime is an act that violates the prohibitions set out in the rule of law, and does not fulfill or go against the orders set out in the rules of law that apply in society. For human interests to be protected, laws must be implemented in accordance with applicable regulations. However, there are often violations of the law, even at the level of law enforcement officials themselves. The Criminal Procedure Code does not explicitly regulate sanctions for law enforcement officials who commit violence or other practices that violate the provisions therein. The method used is juridical normative to explain sanctions for law enforcement officers who violate the Criminal Procedure Code in dealing with crime.Crime is a prohibition set out in the rule of law, and is not in accordance with the orders set out in the rule of law that applies in society. For human interests to be protected, laws must be applied in accordance with applicable regulations. However, various lawsuits were dropped, even at the level of law enforcement itself. The Criminal Procedure Code (Indonesian : KUHAP)does not emphasize sanctions for law enforcement officials who commit violent practices or other practices that conflict with the provisions therein. The purpose of this study is to study law enforcement sanctions that are against the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in dealing with crime.