Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA Abdimas Universal Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Jurnal Sistem Informasi
Yoga Pamungkas
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Reformasi Hukum Trisakti

 1 
- Tinjauan terhadap penyelesaian perselisihan oleh para pihak pada pengadilan hubungan industrial pekanbaru : - Muhammad Andika Rizqi; Yoga Pamungkas
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.17221

Abstract

In the settlement of industrial relations conflict disputes, Law Number 2 of 2004 regarding the Industrial Relations Court requires that a non-litigation settlement is an obligation that needs to be fulfilled first by the parties to the dispute. One of them is Bipartite Negotiation which is a formal requirement in resolving Industrial Relations Disputes conflicts. There are times when the process that the litigants go through is not in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, such as the settlement process that the parties go through in decision Number: 40/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Pbr. So the main problem is whether the procedure for resolving industrial relations conflicts between Sucipto Pardede and PT. Artha Prima Finance in the decision of the Industrial Relations Court is in accordance with the regulations of Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Disputes and Laws in the field of employment? And what are the legal consequences for the parties after the issuance of decision Number: 40/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Pbr? To answer this problem, a normative juridical study was carried out on decision number 40/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2020/PN Pbr and with a descriptive nature
Co-Authors Achdianto Aris Budi Santoso Arobby Mali Dimas Rama Pramudia Ekasatya Aldila Afriansyah Muhammad Andika Rizqi Muhammad Andri Taswin Nurdin Muhammad Zainudin Nur Nadi Hernadi Moorcy Natalia De Andrade Monis Putri Nuvira Mada Revina Ananda Isnaini Reza Putra Setya Setiawati, Anda Tohap Prianto Gultom Yogo Pamungkas, Yogo Yova Ruldeviyani