Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudence TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL
Anjasmana, Haris Kurnia
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBANDINGAN PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN JEPANG Anjasmana, Haris Kurnia
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Vol. 9, No. 2, Desember 2019
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v9i2.8726

Abstract

To produce judges with integrity, professionalism and legal mastery, of course the initial steps are determined by how the judicial filling mechanism is filled. The mechanism for filling judges in Indonesia is experiencing problems because it is not regulated in the judicial power law, only regulated through a Supreme Court Regulation. Plus the still unclear institution that has the authority to do the selection of judges. Japan itself has a procedure to fill a judge's office which is considered one of the best, where the selection can be done through a special school of judges, or a state exam. So it's interesting to compare the filling positions between Indonesia and Japan. Which become the orderly compationis is which institution has the authority to conduct a selection of judges, how about the mechanism to fill a judge's office, as for what identifies the problem in this paper is whether the institution authorized to conduct the selection of first-level judges in Indonesia and Japan is credible or not? second: to what extent are the mechanisms for filling judges in Indonesia and Japan able to produce qualified and integrity judges? Keywords: Filling, recruitment, judge, quality, Japan 
IMPLIKASI PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM SEBAGAI PEJABAT NEGARA TERHADAP SISTEM PERADILAN Anjasmana, Haris Kurnia
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 5, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Tanjungpura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v5i1.37307

Abstract

AbstractSince the implementation of judicial reform, the position of judges has changed to become State Officials. However, in practice, Judges are still civil servants, for example about the recruitment of Candidates for Judges in the Supreme Court for the 2017 Fiscal Year who still use the Civil Servant Candidate recruitment system (CPNS) that can be seen in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2017 concerning Procurement of Judges. The identification of the problem in this paper is How the Problems of Filling Judges' Mechanism as State Officials Affect the Judicial System. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The specification is descriptive-analytical. This method uses secondary data material sourced from literature and related laws and regulations. Also, data analysis uses qualitative analysis. As for the research results, filling the position of a judge using the CPNS system is not a selection like other state officials; of course, it hurts the judicial system's independence because it currently is a state official. By using CPNS-style selection, judges will find it difficult to independently examine and decide a case, especially if it is related to cases that deal with the government; because of the dualism of a judge's position, judges must obey the government, which can interfere with the personal independence of judges and the independence of the Supreme Court as institutional.AbstrakSejak diterapkannya reformasi peradilan, kedudukan hakim telah berganti menjadi Pejabat Negara, Namun praktiknya, Hakim masih berkedudukan sebagai Pegawai Negeri, contohnya berkaitan dengan rekrutmen Calon Hakim di Lingkungan Mahkamah Agung Tahun Anggaran 2017 yang masih menggunakan sistem rekrutmen Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil (CPNS) yang dapat dilihat pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA)  Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Pengadaan Hakim. Adapun identifikasi masalah dalam makalah  ini adalah Bagaimana Problematika Mekanisme Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Sebagai Pejabat Negara Berpengaruh Terhadap Sistem Peradilan. Metode yang digunakan penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi bersifat deskriptif analitis. Metode ini menggunakan bahan data sekunder yang bersumber dari bahan kepustakaan dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait. Selain itu analisis data menggunakan cara analisis kualitatif. Adapun hasil penelitian yaitu Proses pengisian jabatan hakim meggunakan sistem CPNS bukan seleksi layaknya pejabat negara lain tentu mencederai independensi sistem peradilan karena saat ini merupakan pejabat negara. Dengan menggunakan seleksi ala CPNS, hakim akan sulit untuk independen memeriksa dan memutus suatu perkara, apalagi jika terkait perkara yang berurusan dengan pemerintah, karena dualisme kedudukan hakim ini, hakim harus taat kepada pemerintah, itulah yang dapat mengganggu independensi personal hakim maupun independensi Mahkamah Agung secara kelembagaan.
Co-Authors