Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor:137/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Pembatalan Kewenangan Gubernur dalam Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Bonadi, Ahmad; Syafa'at, Rachmad; Sudarsono, Sudarsono
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (275.338 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v4i1p1-14

Abstract

This paper aims to analyzes the consideration of Constitutional Court judges in canceling Article 251 paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (4) and paragraph (8) of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Autonomy and the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The study uses normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The decision of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding their cases is based on the principles of constitutionalism, the principle of the unitary state of the Republic of Indonesia, the principle of regional autonomy and decentralization, and the principle of judicial power and rule of law. The impact of the Constitutional Court Ruling Number: 137/PUU-XIII/2015 is the increased burden of the case of material testing rights in the Supreme Court, the abolition of the governor’s authority to cancel district/city regulations, and hinder the deregulation program to accelerate development.
Peradilan In Absentia bagi Pelanggar Lalu Lintas yang Berkeadilan Dunggio, Haklainul; Sugiri, Bambang; Syafa'at, Rachmad
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 4, No 2 (2019): Desember 2019
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (705.435 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v4i2p259-268

Abstract

This study discusses in absentia trial system for traffic violations in Indonesia, proofing in traffic violations, and whether or not there is a need to prove errors in traffic violations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach. The regulation of in absentia trial system has three requirements. First, absolute in absentia trial system. Second, the judge examines, adjudicates, and decides cases without the presence of the offender. Third, the offender is not called to attend the trials. Proofing of traffic violations has resulted from a valid evidence coupled with the judge's conviction. The faults of offenders in traffic violations must still be proven, not enough just by action.