Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Representation of Indonesia in Wonderful Indonesia’s Feeling is Believing Tourism Advertisement: A Critical Discourse Analysis Poyk, Sisilana Diah Mariastuti; Pandjaitan, Yasmine Anabel
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Vol. 6, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas representasi Indonesia dalam iklan pariwisata Wonderful Indonesia versi Feeling Is Believing (2012) melalui pendekatan analisis wacana kritis terhadap nation branding yang diwacanakan dalam iklan. Korpus penelitian ini adalah sebuah iklan pariwisata yang dikeluarkan oleh Kementrian Pariwisata Republik Indonesia pada tahun 2012. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat apakah wacana representasi Indonesia yang dibangun dalam rangka nation branding melalui iklan pariwisata Wonderful Indonesia: Feeling Is Believing sudah sesuai dengan tujuan dibuatnya iklan. Pendekatan analisis wacana kritis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah tiga dimensi communicative events analysis yang dirumuskan oleh Fairclough (1995). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa representasi Indonesia dalam nation brand Wonderful Indonesia pada wacana iklan belum sesuai dengan tujuan dibuatnya iklan karena elemen-elemen wacana iklan dan interaksi antarelemen tersebut belum mampu membangun nation brand yang dituju oleh pemerintah Indonesia.
EVALUATING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF ONLINE SOURCES: ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA Pandjaitan, Yasmine Anabel
International Review of Humanities Studies Vol. 6, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In 2019’s presidential election in Indonesia, the Internet was flooded by unverified and contradicting claims, which only blurred the lines between fact, opinion, and straight-out hoax. This research investigates how an educated group (college students) evaluates online sources in the context of Indonesia’s political campaigns. An assessment was designed for the students to judge the credibility of five political news articles appearing online in April 2019, the election month. The framework used was inspired by similar assessments conducted by the Stanford History Education Group, researchers who study digital literacy among American students. For this research, fifty students from five faculties in Universitas Indonesia identified false information on the Internet and explained how they recognized it. Their explanations were then classified into three: Mastery, Emerging, and Beginning. The results show that, by and large, the students could recognize sources containing false information. However, only a small percentage provided logical reasoning on Mastery level. It is hoped that the findings give insight into how the students assess online sources and complement other similar works that investigate hoax and political campaigns in other parts of the world.