B1034141016, Hana Dhayan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The Impacts Of Environmental Disclosure On Performance Of PT Elnusa Tbk B1034141016, Hana Dhayan
Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi UNTAN (KIAFE) Vol 7, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Mahasiswa Akuntansi
Publisher : Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi UNTAN (KIAFE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the extent of environmental disclosure in company’s performance and sustainability. This research is conducted as qualitative analysis. This research used 8 years of annual reports and articles to be content analyzed. Findings reveal that environmental disclosure doesn’t contribute much on PT Elnusa Tbk’s performance but it sets certain standard for company’s environmental sustainability. Environmental disclosure by PT Elnusa Tbk becomes its own standard in order to keep the sustainability. Environmental disclosure acts as added value in the annual report to the stakeholders. However, the increasing disclosure trends can be considered as a first step toward improved environmental disclosure. The research therefore supports the the need for a suitable framework for environmental disclosure, such that all the stakeholders can use it as credible information. Keywords: environment, disclosure, performance, sustainability Adams, C. A., Hill, W. and Roberts, C. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour. British Accounting Review, 30(1): 1-21.Adams, C.A.; McNicholas, P. (2002). Making a difference. Sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 20, 382–402Adams, C., Burritt, R., Frost, G. (2008). Integrated Approaches to EnvironmentalSustainability. British Accounting Review, 40(2): 1-26.Ahmadi, A., & Bouri, A.(2017). The relationship between financial attributes,environmental performance and environmental disclosure: Empiricalinvestigation on French firms listed on CAC 40. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(4), pp.490-506.Avram & Avasilcai, S. (2016). Framing the Competitive Behaviors of Niche Players: the Electric Vehicle Business Ecosystem Perspective. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 342 – 351.Bracci, E., & Maran, L. (2013). Environmental Management and Regulation: Pitfalls of Environmental Accounting? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24 (4), pp. 538 – 554.Campbell, D., Craven, B. and Shrives, P. (2003). Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: A comment on perception and legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(4), pp. 558-81.Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5-16.Carroll, A. (1979). A three - dimensional conceptual model of corporateperformance. The Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), pp.497 - 505.Chandok, R.I.S., & Singh, S. (2017). Empirical study on determinants of environmental disclosure: Approach of selected conglomerates. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), pp.332-355.Charl, d. V., & Chris, v. S. (2012). New Zealand Shareholder Attitudes Towards Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 24 (2), pp. 186 – 210.Cho, C., Patten, D. and Roberts, R. (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), pp. 139-154.Cho, R.W., Song, Y., & Littleton, J. T. (2010) Comparative Analysis of Drosophila and Mammalian Complexins as Fusion Clamps and Facilitators of Neurotransmitter Release. Mollecular and Cellular Neurosciences, 45(4), 389 – 397.De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. (2012). New Zealand shareholder attitudestowards corporate environmental disclosure. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(2), pp.186-210.Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 9 (2), pp. 50 – 67.Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability, 10 (4), pp.562-583.Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Social Incidents: Australia Evidence , Accounting Forum, 24 (1), pp. 101- 130.Deegan, C. (2000), Financial Accounting Theory, McGraw Hill Book Company,Sydney.Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimizing Effect of Social and EnvironmentalDisclosures- A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 282-311.Deegan, C. & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure policiesof Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), pp.187-99.Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. (1997). The materiality of environmental informationto users of annual reports.  Accounting, Auditing and AccountabilityJournal, 10(4), pp. 562-83. Deegan, C.,  Rankin, M.  and Voght, P.   (2000).  Firms’ Disclosure Reactions toSocial Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum, 24(1), pp. 101-130.Deegan, C. , Rankin, M.  and Tobin, J.  (2002).  An Examination of the CorporateSocial and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A Test ofLegitimacy    Theory.    Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 312-43.Djajadikerta, H.G., & Trireksani, T. (2012). Corporate social and environmentaldisclosure by  Indonesian  listed companies  on their corporate web sites.Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13(1), pp.21-36.Dosinta,  N.  F.,     Brata,     H.,     & Heniwati, E.     (2017).    Implikasi Legitimacy Theory Dalam CSR  Bank    Kalbar   Untuk   Peningkatan Kualitas SDM diKalimantan Barat. In S. . Panjaitan, N. Bariyah, & Z. Zain (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (PIPT) (pp.5–16). Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.Enrico Bracci,  E.,  Laura Maran,  L.   (2013).   Environmental management andregulation:   pitfalls   of  environmental  accounting? .    Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(4), pp.538-554.Fallan, E. (2015). Explaining the variation in adoption rates of the information content of environmental disclosure: An exploration of innovation adoption  theory. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(2), pp.247-268.Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. N Y Times Mag (32–33), pp.122–126.Frost, G. R. (2007). The Introduction of Mandatory Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Australian Evidence. Abacus, 43(2), pp.190-216. Giordano-spring, S., Cahuvey, J., Cho, C., & Patten, D. (2015). The Normativity and Legitimacy of CSR Disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics 2015, 130 (4), 789 – 803.Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995). Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), pp. 78-101.Gray, R., Javad, M., Porter, D.M. & Sinclair, C.D. (2001) “Social and Environmental Disclosure and Corporate Characteristics: A Research Note and Extension”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28, (3-4), 327-356.Guthrie and Parker. (1989). Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19, 343 – 352.Hassan, A., Guo, X. (2017). The relationships between reporting format,environmental disclosure and environmental performance: An empiricalstudy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(4), pp.425-444.Holmes, S. (1976). Executive perception of corporate social responsibility.Business Horizons, (19), pp. 34-40.IIRC 2013. Availabe online at : http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/IR-Discussion-Paper-2011_spreads.pdf [Accessed 03 May 2017]IIRC 2014. Available online at: http://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Consultation-Draft-of-theInternationalIRFramework.pdf [Accessed 02 May 2017]Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach. Business Strategic and the Environment, 21, pp. 299 – 316.Khlif, H., Guidara, A., Souissi, M. (2015). Corporate social and environmentaldisclosure and corporate performance: Evidence from South Africa andMorocco. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(1), pp.51-69.KPMG International. “KPMG International Survey of Corporate ResponsibilityReporting20011.”www.kpmg.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/International-corporateresponsibility-survey-2008_v2.pdf.Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis An Introduction to Its Methodology.Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Li, Y., Thornton, D. B., & Gordon , R. (1997). Corporate Disclosure of Environmental Liability Information: Theory and Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(3), 435 – 474.Miles, Samantha (2011). Stakeholder Definitions: Profusion and  Confusion. EIASM 1st interdisciplinary conference on stakeholder, resources and value creation, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Barcelona.Miles, Samantha.         (2012).            Stakeholders :   essentially    contested or justconfused?. Journal of Business Ethics. 108 (3), pp. 285–298.Milne, M., Patten, D. (2001). Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimentaldecision case examining the impact of ED. APIRA Conference, pp.1-44.Murray, A.,Sinclair,  D., Power, D., Gray, R.  (2006). Do  financial  markets   careabout    social      and  environmental  disclosure? :  Further  evidence  andexploration from the UK.   Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,19(2), pp.228-255Nor, N. M., Bahari, N.A.S., Adnan, N.A., Kamal, S.M.Q.A.S., Ali, I.M. (2015).The Effects of Environmental Disclosure on Financial Performance inMalaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(7), pp.117 – 126.OECD, Principles of Corporate Governance (Paris: OECD, 2012), available online at: www.oecd.org/daf/corporateaffairs/principles/text. [Accessed 02 May 2017]O’Donovan, G. (1999). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability,15 (3), pp.344 – 371.Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10 (4), 297 – 308.Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 17 (5), 471 – 475.Perry, M., Singh, S. 2011. Corporate environmental responsibility in Singapore andMalaysia:   The potential and limits of voluntary initiatives.   Technology,Business and Society Programme Paper, 3, 135-137.Sen, M., Mukherjee, K., Pattanayak, J.K. (2011). Corporate environmentaldisclosure practices in India. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(2), pp.139-156.Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach. New Jersey,Merrill: Prentice Hall.Solomon, J.F., & Solomon, A. (2006). Private social, ethical and environmentaldisclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), pp.564-591.Smith, M., Yahya, K., Amiruddin, A.M. (2007). Environmental disclosure andperformance reporting in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2),pp.185-199.Walden, D. & Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125 – 154.Wilmhurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 13(1), pp.10-26.