Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jatijajar Law Review
Asyikin, Nehru
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal politics of bureaucratic reform in really good governance according to prophetical law Asyikin, Nehru
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 28, No 1 (2020): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (405.461 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v28i1.10393

Abstract

This research was conducted to analyse the political politics of bureaucratic reform. The politics of law in reforming government bureaucracy is actually useful for making improvements so that it becomes a public servant and realizing good governance. The problem with corruption, collusion and nepotism in the bureaucracy, is not because the legal umbrella in Indonesia is not strong but subjectively every state civil servant or civil servant does not yet have the full characteristics as in the prophetic concept. Through normative juridical research methods, this study tries to explore prophetic concepts to realize good governance. The results showed that it was hoped that this prophetic concept could become its future social ideals and as a guidebook for each ASN and PNS in its soul in carrying out its public service duties. Prophetic focuses on principles of behavior that originate from religious values. So that all executive, legislative and judicial branches can make moral ethics universally from the prophetic concept in providing services to the community in order to realize good governance
TANGGUNG JAWAB JABATAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PRIBADI DALAM PENGGUNAAN DISKRESI Asyikin, Nehru; Setiawan, Adam
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Discretion is part of the authority to act freely by government officials to ensure the implementation of public services. However, the discretionary rules inherent in the office when it must be immediately to act without written law creates a conflict about the government must be based on the law. On the other hand the need for discretion becomes a polemic regarding job responsibilities and personal responsibility in the use of discretion, which parameters of use sometimes cause harm to society. The results of the study show that the implications of using discretion in the actions of officials that are used in the interest of public services turn out to cause losses to the state and society. The use of discretion is even used as a tool for personal gain and raises abuse of authority which results in violating the laws and regulations, contrary to the principles of law, illegal acts and AAUPB.
Impeachment Sebagai Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Presiden Indonesia Dalam Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis Setiawan, Adam; Asyikin, Nehru; Hidayati, Fatma; Isnawati, Isnawati
JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW Vol 2, No 2 (2023): JATIJAJAR LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26753/jlr.v2i2.1161

Abstract

Based on the history of Indonesian state administration, there are two cases of impeachment that have occurred against active Presidents, namely President Soekarno and President Abdurrahman Wahid. However, it needs to be understood that the impeachment process is not as easy as the previous experience because it has been rigidly regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to comprehensively explore the impeachment process as a form of Presidential accountability in a democratic state of law. This research is a doctrinal research, using a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that impeachment as the President's responsibility contains two patterns, namely political and legal mechanisms. The political mechanism is when the President is demanded accountability by the DPR which is then submitted to the MPR, (a joint session between DPR and DPD) then the Constitutional Court examines, hears and decides. as for the involvement of the Constitutional Court as a form of legal mechanism. Political and legal mechanisms in the impeachment process involving the role of DPR, MPR (filled with members of DPR and DPD), and the Constitutional Court is a manifestation of the principle of checks and balances. The final result of the institution that decides the impeachment of the President and / or Vice President if proven guilty is the MPR, as a form of accountability to the people through its representatives in the MPR which contains representation of the people (DPR) and representation of groups in the region (DPD) by not also leaving the principle of the rule of law as reflected in the role of the Constitutional Court in examining, adjudicating, and deciding.
Checks and balances antara lembaga legislatif dengan eksekutif terhadap perjanjian internasional pasca putusan MK No. 13/PUU-XVI/2018 Asyikin, Nehru
PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 14 No 1 (2020): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v14i1.1653

Abstract

Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan Pasal 10 Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 bertentangan dengan Konstitusi Indonesia dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat, namun secara bersyarat bahwa persetujuan legislatif hanya pada jenis-jenis perjanjian tersebut pada Pasal 10. Perjanjian internasional yang dilakukan eksekutif menimbulkan paradigma terkait pengawasan dan mengimbangi eksekutif terhadap penerapan perjanjian internasional ke dalam sistem hukum nasional sehingga paradigma tersebut menghadirkan prinsip checks and balances dikeduanya. legislatif memiliki kewenangan penuh berada untuk mengkaji peraturan yang hendak di ratifikasi yang bersumber dari perjanjian internasional bertentangan dengan UUD atau tidak. Kontrol legislatif terletak pada Pasal 11 ayat 2 UUD apabila perjanjian internasional itu menimbulkan dampak bagi kehidupan rakyat terkait dengan beban keuangan Negara dan perasyarat menurut Pasal 10 UU Nomor 24 tahun 2000 tentang perjanjian internasional. Sedangkan hak presiden untuk mengeluarkan Keputusan Presiden hanya sebatas evaluasi saja kepada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, dimaknai sebagai proses menilai norma-norma yang berlaku di Indonesia sehingga ratifikasi melalui Keputusan Presiden tidak bersifat menolak tetapi mengevaluasi dan dikembalikan kepada Presiden untuk di terbitkan dalam lembaran negara. Sama halnya dengan menteri, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat diposisikan sebagai lembaga yang diminta pertimbangan atau konsultasi saja, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat tidak memiliki kewenangan untuk membatalkan kebijakan yang akan diambil Menteri tersebut.
Co-Authors Adam Setiawan, Adam Fatma Hidayati, Fatma Isnawati Isnawati