Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Jurnal Yuridis Media Iuris Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan
Baried, Rizky Ramadhan
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
HUBUNGAN PENERAPAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 DENGAN KEADILAN BAGI TERDAKWA (KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN MENGENAI PERKARA PENCURIAN RINGAN) Baried, Rizky Ramadhan
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 4, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (221.856 KB) | DOI: 10.35586/.v4i1.129

Abstract

Regulation of Indonesian Supreme Court Number 2 years 2012 has an interesting dynamic application, in first of two years after applied, court still view it as a regulation in socialiszation period, with the result that unsuccessful applied. Since in 2014, it started to be applied, even it started by police investigation, until based on authority from prosecutor, investigator can bestow light stealing case to court by way of rapid judicial procedure. By thus defendant?s right, that is gain a rapid judicial procedure, simple, and cheap has ful fill based on juridical practice.
JUDGE’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE MEDIATOR’S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE BAD FAITH PARTY AND MEDIATION FEES ISSUE Baried, Rizky Ramadhan; Jamil, Abdul
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 March 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.793

Abstract

This article was the result of research in 2021 with normative research. The formulations of the problems are: 1) What is the consideration of the panel of judges on the recommendation of the mediator regarding the sanctions for payment of mediation fees for parties who are declared to have no good intentions; 2) What is the procedure for payment of mediation fees by these parties. The conclusions are: 1) There is no data on the mediator's recommendation regarding paying mediation fees. It is not immediately followed up if the panel of judges receives it. The judges continue to examine the recommendation of providing justice so that the defendant does not feel more burdened so that the recommendation is not included in the court’s product; and 2) The procedure for payment of mediation fees is carried out together with the accumulated principal costs of the case by complying with the principles of execution. This study advises the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia that there should be a mechanism agreed upon by both parties to jointly consign the amount of money that is expected to be used in the mediation process
Kedudukan Upaya Administratif dalam Dismissal Process dan Konstruksi Ideal Pemeriksaan Syarat Formal Gugatan Baried, Rizky Ramadhan; Ridwan
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.43207

Abstract

This article analyzes administrative effort in the relation of Article 62 Law 5/1986 with Article 75 Law 30/2014 and Article 2 Supreme Court Regulation 6/ 2018. The purposes are: 1) To analyze the position and urgency taken by administrative effort in the dismissal process examination by the chairman; and 2) To formulate the ideal formula for examining the formal requirements of the administrative lawsuit before being examined by the panel of judges. This article aims to provide a practical explanation of these norms. It is a normative juridical type with a statute, a conceptual, and a caseapproach. The results are: 1) Administrative effort is a formal requirement in filing a lawsuit related to competence, so the chairman can determine that the lawsuit is not accepted; 2) The dismissal process and the preparatory examination by analogy has similarities, therefore these examinations can be combined with the condition that in filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff is required to attach evidence of having taken administrative effort. It recommends that executive/legislature make regulations related to the procedural law for examining administrative effort, and for the supreme court to review the norms and practices of the dismissal process and the preparatory examination in relation to formal requirements for filing a lawsuit.
Kedudukan dan Urgensi Tempuh Upaya Administratif dalam Pemeriksaan Dismissal Process oleh Ketua Pengadilan Baried, Rizky Ramadhan
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 52, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article analyzes administrative effort (AE) in the relation of Article 62 Law 5/1986 with Article 75 Law 30/2014 and Article 2 SCR 6/ 2018. The legal questions are: 1) How was the position and urgency taken by AE in the dismissal process examination by the chairman? 2) What is the ideal formula for examining the formal requirements of the administrative lawsuit before being examined by the panel of judges? This article aims to provide a practical explanation of these norms. It is a normative juridical type with a statute and a conceptual approach. The results are: 1) AE is a formal requirement in filing a lawsuit related to competence, so the chairman can determine that the lawsuit is not accepted; 2) The dismissal process and the preparatory examination by analogy has similarities, therefore these examinations can be combined with the condition that in filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff is required to attach evidence of having taken AE. It recommends that executive/legislature make regulations related to the procedural law for examining AE, and for the supreme court to review the norms and practices of the dismissal process and the preparatory examination in relation to formal requirements for filing a lawsuit.
Free Legal Aid Policy: The Role and Challenges of Legal Aid Organizations to the Poor Baried, Rizky Ramadhan
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 2 MARET 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia makes a policy for legal aid organizations to carry out legal aid on a pro bono basis to get the legal aid budget ceiling for the following year. The purposes of this study are to analyze the role of legal aid organizations in realizing pro bono legal aid to implement access to justice for the poor; and to analyze their challenges in fulfilling The Ministry of Law and Human Right’s policy of implementing pro bono legal aid to get the legal aid budget ceiling for the following year. This research using empirical juridical research methods, with a sociological, statutory and a conceptual approach. Primary and secondary data obtained through interview techniques, observations, and literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show that legal aid organizations play a preventive role in the form of legal counseling activities to the community and actively serve consultations to legal aid both inside and outside the trial for the poor; The challenge they encountered was in the form of rivalry between fellow legal aid organizations which were then required to innovatively get closer to the need for free legal aid for the underprivileged.
Co-Authors Abdul Jamil Ridwan