Sarifudin, Risman
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Enhancing transparency and accountability in public administration through information technology utilization Sarifudin, Risman; Damanik, Fritz Hotman Syahmahita
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v15i1.661

Abstract

Many problems regarding the use of information technology to provide and increase transparency and accountability in public administration must be studied more deeply. Based on these problems, this study aims to explore and examine the use of information technology in increasing transparency and accountability in terms of public administration. The method used in this study is the qualitative research method.  Data Collection Techniques in this study go through three stages: observation, interviews, and search for supporting written data.  After the data is obtained, data analysis is carried out. Data analysis is carried out using qualitative analysis methods. The findings underscore that IT implementation significantly improves accessibility to public information, fosters a culture of efficiency through streamlined administrative practices, and strengthens oversight mechanisms. Moreover, the study identifies challenges related to data security, disparities in IT access, and resistance to technological change within administrative structures. Recognizing the necessity for comprehensive policies, the research emphasizes the need for governance frameworks that embrace technological advancements and address associated challenges. The study advocates for a holistic approach to maximize the positive impact of IT on transparency and accountability in public administration. This research contributes to the discourse on the intersection of technology and governance, providing insights that can inform policymakers, administrators, and researchers in advancing effective strategies for utilizing IT to foster transparency and accountability in public administration.
The Disproportionality Analysis of Sainte-Laguë Method Using Gallagher Index in Banggai Regency Legislative Election 2024 : Analisis Ketidakseimbangan Metode Sainte-Laguë Menggunakan Indeks Gallagher dalam Pemilihan Legislatif Kabupaten Banggai Tahun 2024 hartati, andi; Rahmad; Sarifudin, Risman
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Media Hukum (JMH)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tompotika Luwuk Banggai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59414/jmh.v14i1.1304

Abstract

This study aims to measure and analyze the level of disproporsionality between the votes obtained by political parties and the number of seats they receive in the 2024 legislative election ini Banggai Regency. It also seeks to assess the effectiveness of the Sainte-Lague method ini achieving proportional representation and identify factors contributing to the level of disproporsionality found in the legislative election in Bangggai Regency. This research uses a quantitative approach to analyze the election results data from the 2024 legislative election in Banggai Regency. The quantitative analysis will be conducted using the Least Squares Index (LSq) or Gallagher Index to determine the level of disproporsionality between the percentage of votes obtained by political parties and the percentage of seats they receive in the legislative council. The findings in this study show the the Gallagher Index at the electoral district level show significant disproporsionality. However, whwn calculated for the overall seats in the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD), this index is relatively small. In the electoral district of Banggai Regency, the Gallagher Index results indicate an average above 8 or within the range of 5-10. This suggest that the LSq/Gallagher Index interpretation of the electoral system in Banggai Regency demonstrates moderate disproporsionality. There is a significant diffrence between the percentage of votes and seats, some parties receive more or fewer seats compared to the percentage of votes the obtain, which can lead to dissatisfaction among voters.